Open
Conversation
|
|
Contributor
|
Hi @mmoll ! The closed PR you’re referring to already answers the question about adding new platforms to the Trivy build process. |
Author
|
Well, I built a release with a standard GH worker without problems: https://github.com/mmoll/trivy/actions/runs/22230099295/job/64307084839 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
I'd like to include trivy also on RISC-V in the k3s build I'm working on.
Not directly related: If diskspace on build time is still a relevant problem, I think limiting the parallelism of goreleaser could help.
Related PRs
linux/riscv64#4992Checklist