fix: include client_secret_expires_at in client registration response#164
Merged
mattzcarey merged 3 commits intocloudflare:mainfrom Mar 4, 2026
Merged
Conversation
When a confidential client is registered and a client_secret is returned, the response was missing the client_secret_expires_at field required by RFC 7591 (OAuth 2.0 Dynamic Client Registration). This change adds client_secret_expires_at: 0 to the registration response, indicating the secret does not expire. Clients that strictly follow the spec may reject responses without this field.
🦋 Changeset detectedLatest commit: ca3976d The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump. This PR includes changesets to release 1 package
Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are. Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR |
commit: |
4 tasks
…eset - Add client_secret_issued_at to registration response (RFC 7591 §3.2.1) - Assert secret fields are absent for public clients - Add changeset for patch bump
mattzcarey
approved these changes
Mar 4, 2026
Merged
mattzcarey
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 4, 2026
This PR was opened by the [Changesets release](https://github.com/changesets/action) GitHub action. When you're ready to do a release, you can merge this and the packages will be published to npm automatically. If you're not ready to do a release yet, that's fine, whenever you add more changesets to main, this PR will be updated. # Releases ## @cloudflare/workers-oauth-provider@0.3.0 ### Minor Changes - [#158](#158) [`b26f7ff`](b26f7ff) Thanks [@mattzcarey](https://github.com/mattzcarey)! - Add `clientIdMetadataDocumentEnabled` option to make CIMD (Client ID Metadata Document) support explicitly opt-in. Previously, CIMD auto-enabled when the `global_fetch_strictly_public` compatibility flag was present, which could cause crashes for servers where URL-shaped client_ids hit bot-protected endpoints. When not enabled (the default), URL-formatted client_ids now fall through to standard KV lookup instead of throwing. - [#144](#144) [`49a1d24`](49a1d24) Thanks [@mattzcarey](https://github.com/mattzcarey)! - Add `revokeExistingGrants` option to `completeAuthorization()` that revokes existing grants for the same user+client after creating a new one. Defaults to `true`, fixing infinite re-auth loops when props change between authorizations (issue #34). Set to `false` to allow multiple concurrent grants per user+client. Revoke tokens and grant when an authorization code is reused, per RFC 6749 §10.5. This prevents authorization code replay attacks by invalidating all tokens issued from the first exchange. **Breaking behavior change:** Previously, re-authorizing the same user+client created an additional grant, leaving old tokens valid. Now, old grants are revoked by default. If your application relies on multiple concurrent grants per user+client, set `revokeExistingGrants: false` to preserve the old behavior. ### Patch Changes - [#164](#164) [`4b640a3`](4b640a3) Thanks [@pnguyen-atlassian](https://github.com/pnguyen-atlassian)! - Include `client_secret_expires_at` and `client_secret_issued_at` in dynamic client registration responses when a `client_secret` is issued, per RFC 7591 §3.2.1. - [#165](#165) [`9cce070`](9cce070) Thanks [@mattzcarey](https://github.com/mattzcarey)! - Use `Promise.allSettled` instead of `Promise.all` for best-effort grant revocation in `completeAuthorization()`, ensuring all grants are attempted even if one fails. Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #163
When a confidential client is registered and a client_secret is returned, the response was missing the client_secret_expires_at field required by RFC 7591 (OAuth 2.0 Dynamic Client Registration).
This change adds client_secret_expires_at: 0 to the registration response, indicating the secret does not expire. Clients that strictly follow the spec may reject responses without this field.