Enable deit_tiny template by default

[wonjuleee]

Summary

How to test

Checklist

• I have added unit tests to cover my changes.​
• I have added integration tests to cover my changes.​
• I have added e2e tests for validation.
• I have added the description of my changes into CHANGELOG in my target branch (e.g., CHANGELOG in develop).​
• I have updated the documentation in my target branch accordingly (e.g., documentation in develop).
• I have linked related issues.

License

• I submit my code changes under the same Apache License that covers the project.
  Feel free to contact the maintainers if that's a concern.
• I have updated the license header for each file (see an example below).

# Copyright (C) 2023 Intel Corporation
# SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Patch and project coverage have no change.

Comparison is base (e5b1000) 0.00% compared to head (32ac1e7) 0.00%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           develop   #2282   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage     0.00%   0.00%           
=======================================
  Files          498     498           
  Lines        37574   37577    +3     
=======================================
- Misses       37574   37577    +3     

Flag	Coverage Δ
py310	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
py38	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
py39	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...x/algorithms/classification/adapters/mmcls/task.py	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[sungmanc]

@wonjuleee , is it okay to merge? or do you want to merge this PR after checking the effect of the Geti side?

[goodsong81]

Let's hold this PR until the Geti implements static model template mapping. It's OK for testing purpose.

[JihwanEom]

Sorry for interrupting, we need to check documentation coverage if we promote DeiT template as default.

FYI, the performance of multi-label and h-label classification is not validated for DeiT template. Thanks!

[wonjuleee]

@wonjuleee , is it okay to merge? or do you want to merge this PR after checking the effect of the Geti side?

I am currently working on manual testing on Geti.
I temporarily copied the data_cfg in mmcls task. @jaegukhyun, please let me know when you create the related PR. I will update this after merging your PR.

[goodsong81]

Checked that DeiT is registered as custom model on Geti.