Job, Task, and Workflow names are all unnecessarily truncated in the workflow/pipeline UI #139884
Replies: 2 comments
-
|
💬 Your Product Feedback Has Been Submitted 🎉 Thank you for taking the time to share your insights with us! Your feedback is invaluable as we build a better GitHub experience for all our users. Here's what you can expect moving forward ⏩
Where to look to see what's shipping 👀
What you can do in the meantime 💻
As a member of the GitHub community, your participation is essential. While we can't promise that every suggestion will be implemented, we want to emphasize that your feedback is instrumental in guiding our decisions and priorities. Thank you once again for your contribution to making GitHub even better! We're grateful for your ongoing support and collaboration in shaping the future of our platform. ⭐ |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
you can add this as a bookmark and when you click on it you get full names same script formatted: |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Select Topic Area
Product Feedback
Body
Multiple people in my org have reached out about the frustrating UI experience that GitHub Actions has in regards to longer / hierarchical names for jobs, tasks, and workflows. It would be really nice if the Actions team could add either options for configuring your pipeline view, or just lengthened the amount of characters that are displayed.
An example of what is bothering people...

As you can see, everything is truncated. Granted, the names here are a bit overly verbose, but the lack of any options for more verbose task, job, and workflow names is very frustrating. It would be nice if the jobs section on the left side of the screen could have an adjustable width. It would be nice if we could have multiple line, or expanded, names in the pipeline UI. Any improvement here would be appreciated.
Any chance that the Actions team(s) can take a look at this? I've seen multiple similar discussions, but they've all sat stale for way too long.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions