-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8.4k
chore: output console error for invalid route component #5593
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@mynetfan has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 21 minutes and 40 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
WalkthroughThe changes enhance the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Caller as Caller
participant Convert as convertRoutes
participant PageMap as PageMap Lookup
participant Logger as Logger
Caller->>Convert: Invoke convertRoutes(route)
Convert->>PageMap: Determine component using pageKey
alt Component exists in PageMap
PageMap-->>Convert: Return component
Convert->>Caller: Return route with valid component
else Component missing
Convert->>Logger: Log error with invalid route info
Convert->>Caller: Return route without valid component
end
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
packages/utils/src/helpers/generate-routes-backend.ts (1)
59-66: LGTM! The error handling enhancement looks good.The changes effectively implement the PR objective by adding clear error reporting for invalid route components. The code is well-structured and maintains backward compatibility.
Consider enhancing the error message format for better readability:
- console.error(`route component is invalid: ${pageKey}`, route); + console.error('Invalid route component:', { path: pageKey, route });
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
packages/utils/src/helpers/generate-routes-backend.ts(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (8)
- GitHub Check: Test (windows-latest)
- GitHub Check: Check (windows-latest)
- GitHub Check: Lint (windows-latest)
- GitHub Check: post-update (windows-latest)
- GitHub Check: Check (ubuntu-latest)
- GitHub Check: post-update (ubuntu-latest)
- GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
- GitHub Check: Lint (ubuntu-latest)
6b1db17 to
715b97a
Compare
Description
close #5515
Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
pnpm-lock.yamlunless you introduce a new test example.Checklist
pnpm run docs:devcommand.pnpm test.feat:,fix:,perf:,docs:, orchore:.Summary by CodeRabbit