Skip to content

test latest from main with cmake build#205

Closed
anton-seaice wants to merge 5 commits into
dev-1deg_jra55_ryffrom
cice5-cmake-baseline
Closed

test latest from main with cmake build#205
anton-seaice wants to merge 5 commits into
dev-1deg_jra55_ryffrom
cice5-cmake-baseline

Conversation

@anton-seaice
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

No description provided.

@anton-seaice
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

!test repro

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

github-actions Bot commented Dec 3, 2025

⚠️ The Bitwise Reproducibility Check Had Errors - Check https://github.com/ACCESS-NRI/access-om2-configs/actions/runs/19883442760 ⚠️
❌ The Bitwise Reproducibility Check Failed ❌

When comparing:

  • cice5-cmake-baseline (checksums created using commit 8d19882), against
  • release-1deg_jra55_ryf (checksums in commit fce24e3)
Further information

The experiment can be found on Gadi at /scratch/tm70/repro-ci/experiments/access-om2-configs/8d198824bb5c29ac468fd0af4e344882af7c5969, and the test results at https://github.com/ACCESS-NRI/access-om2-configs/runs/56986069103.

The checksums generated by this !test command are found in the testing/checksum directory of https://github.com/ACCESS-NRI/access-om2-configs/actions/runs/19883442760/artifacts/4746863423.

The checksums compared against are found here https://github.com/ACCESS-NRI/access-om2-configs/tree/fce24e35bdf35720a15b6b03fa3616d3486f50b4/testing/checksum

Test summary:
🔥 test_repro_historical

@anton-seaice anton-seaice changed the title test latest from main with new pio test latest from main with cmake build Dec 3, 2025
@anton-seaice anton-seaice changed the base branch from release-1deg_jra55_ryf to dev-1deg_jra55_ryf December 3, 2025 05:41
@anton-seaice
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

!test repro

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

github-actions Bot commented Dec 3, 2025

⚠️ The Bitwise Reproducibility Check Had Errors - Check https://github.com/ACCESS-NRI/access-om2-configs/actions/runs/19883725417 ⚠️
❌ The Bitwise Reproducibility Check Failed ❌

When comparing:

  • cice5-cmake-baseline (checksums created using commit 2316ff4), against
  • dev-1deg_jra55_ryf (checksums in commit 9efb671)
Further information

The experiment can be found on Gadi at /scratch/tm70/repro-ci/experiments/access-om2-configs/2316ff41dc0a049a1d575fa64e01f1df1f09cb50, and the test results at https://github.com/ACCESS-NRI/access-om2-configs/runs/56986850625.

The checksums generated by this !test command are found in the testing/checksum directory of https://github.com/ACCESS-NRI/access-om2-configs/actions/runs/19883725417/artifacts/4746950136.

The checksums compared against are found here https://github.com/ACCESS-NRI/access-om2-configs/tree/9efb671005f88eb2099f3e3a6dda4e5563a9e178/testing/checksum

Test summary:
🔥 test_repro_historical

@anton-seaice
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

!test repro

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

github-actions Bot commented Dec 3, 2025

✅ The Bitwise Reproducibility Check Succeeded ✅

When comparing:

  • cice5-cmake-baseline (checksums created using commit 5888c2f), against
  • dev-1deg_jra55_ryf (checksums in commit 9efb671)
Further information

The experiment can be found on Gadi at /scratch/tm70/repro-ci/experiments/access-om2-configs/5888c2f9fb596143b673526e88b80f100315b694, and the test results at https://github.com/ACCESS-NRI/access-om2-configs/runs/57078239815.

The checksums generated by this !test command are found in the testing/checksum directory of https://github.com/ACCESS-NRI/access-om2-configs/actions/runs/19910555393/artifacts/4757283700.

The checksums compared against are found here https://github.com/ACCESS-NRI/access-om2-configs/tree/9efb671005f88eb2099f3e3a6dda4e5563a9e178/testing/checksum

Test summary:
test_repro_historical

@anton-seaice
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

anton-seaice commented Dec 3, 2025

this shows that the cmake build with latest from parallelio is bfb (for my sanity mostly)

anton-seaice added a commit to ACCESS-NRI/cice5 that referenced this pull request Dec 17, 2025
The goal here is to enable multiple timesteps per history file when
using PIO, to be consistent with the access-esm1.6 branch. In the
access-esm1.6 branch, this
[change](#59) was implemented
only when using Netcdf for IO. Closes #58

1. This change relies on latest in ParallelIO
(NCAR/ParallelIO#2016). (Updating ParallelIO is
not answer changing -
[build](ACCESS-NRI/ACCESS-OM2#125) and
[repro](ACCESS-NRI/access-om2-configs#205 (comment))
)
2. This changes the time variable to be in the middle of the averaging
interval
3. error handling is added/modified on an as needed basis, rather than
comprehensively
4. Output files follow the ocean convention now, e.g
_iceh-1monthly-mean_1900.nc_
@anton-seaice anton-seaice deleted the cice5-cmake-baseline branch February 2, 2026 02:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant