Skip to content

Conversation

@DelloStritto
Copy link
Contributor

  • Add antiparticles in the Lc selector
  • Add the Lc -> pi K p case in the Lc selector
  • Commenting out the PID selection in the Lc selector (more tests are needed)
  • Move to the histogram registry in the Lc task
  • Add the MC matching in the Lc task

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Using int8_t here would use 4 times less memory.

@jgrosseo jgrosseo marked this pull request as draft December 6, 2020 18:29
@jgrosseo
Copy link
Collaborator

jgrosseo commented Dec 6, 2020

Please use draft PR when you don't want to merge

@nzardosh
Copy link
Contributor

I think from my side on the selectors this PR is good to go, we already discussed and all the modifications were implemented (I just did not check the MC part)

@ginnocen
Copy link
Collaborator

hi @DelloStritto @nzardosh, thanks to both. If you think is ready for final review and merge, please remove the "DO NOT MERGE".

@DelloStritto DelloStritto changed the title PWGHF, DO NOT MERGE: Update of the Lc->pKpi selector and task PWGHF: Update of the Lc->pKpi selector and task Dec 18, 2020
@ginnocen ginnocen marked this pull request as ready for review December 19, 2020 20:33
@ginnocen
Copy link
Collaborator

@jgrosseo @iarsene. Can anyone of you with O2 superpowers approve this one. Given it is not passing some (unrelated) I cannot merge it. Thanks a lot!

@jgrosseo
Copy link
Collaborator

jgrosseo commented Jan 4, 2021

Failure unrelated. Merging.

@jgrosseo jgrosseo merged commit 47d1a6a into AliceO2Group:dev Jan 4, 2021
EmilGorm pushed a commit to EmilGorm/AliceO2 that referenced this pull request Nov 22, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants