-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7.3k
fix(proxy): pass-through multipart uploads and Bedrock JSON body #25464
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
5c4915a
fix(proxy): pass-through multipart uploads and Bedrock custom body
shivamrawat1 20b16b3
chore(proxy): match CRLF line endings in pass_through_endpoints
shivamrawat1 627d70a
Potential fix for pull request finding 'CodeQL / Module-level cyclic …
shivamrawat1 574eb20
fix: import LITELLM_PASS_THROUGH_CUSTOM_BODY_STATE_KEY for bedrock pa…
shivamrawat1 3742b0c
refactor: define pass-through custom body state key in types module
shivamrawat1 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
NameError—LITELLM_PASS_THROUGH_CUSTOM_BODY_STATE_KEYis not in scopeLITELLM_PASS_THROUGH_CUSTOM_BODY_STATE_KEYis defined inpass_through_endpoints.pybut is not imported into this module. The top-level import block (lines 38-43) brings inHttpPassThroughEndpointHelpers,create_pass_through_route, etc., but not this constant._get_litellm_pass_through_custom_body_state_key()was added to provide a lazy import, but it is never called here — the bare name is referenced instead. Every call tobedrock_proxy_routewill raiseNameError: name 'LITELLM_PASS_THROUGH_CUSTOM_BODY_STATE_KEY' is not defined.Fix: add the constant to the existing top-level import (no circular-import concern —
llm_passthrough_endpointsalready imports frompass_through_endpointsat module level):The
_get_litellm_pass_through_custom_body_state_key()helper can then be removed as it becomes dead code.