Conversation
|
This LGTM - does @dgarijo want to have a look? Concerning the versioning, it's actually unclear how we version the different schemas in this repo. They are now aligned, but it's more by chance I think. It's ok to always keep them aligned but it should be clarified (i'll open an issue now). |
| "@id": "https://w3id.org/everse/rsqa#", | ||
| "@type": "owl:Ontology", | ||
| "dcterms:creator": [ | ||
| "Faruk Diblen", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
In theory this should be an object (i.e., something with name and id), not a string
| "rdfs:label": "check evidence", | ||
| "rdfs:comment": "Additional information or evidence on how the check status was concluded.", | ||
| "rdfs:domain": { "@id": "rsqa:CheckResult" }, | ||
| "rdfs:range": { "@id": "xsd:string" } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| "rdfs:range": { "@id": "xsd:string" } | |
| "rdfs:range": { "@id": "schema:Text" } |
| "rdfs:label": "check output", | ||
| "rdfs:comment": "The raw output or result value of the check.", | ||
| "rdfs:domain": { "@id": "rsqa:CheckResult" }, | ||
| "rdfs:range": { "@id": "xsd:string" } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| "rdfs:range": { "@id": "xsd:string" } | |
| "rdfs:range": { "@id": "schema:Text" } |
| "@id": "rsqa:SoftwareQualityAssessment", | ||
| "@type": "rdfs:Class", | ||
| "rdfs:label": "Software Quality Assessment", | ||
| "rdfs:comment": "A software quality assessment represents the result of measured indicators for a piece of software." |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| "rdfs:comment": "A software quality assessment represents the result of measured indicators for a piece of software." | |
| "rdfs:comment": "A software quality assessment represents the result of measuring a set of indicators for a piece of software. The result is a set of rsqa:CheckResults" |
|
I clarified a definition, the rest are small cosmetic things that maybe we should consider for consistency. Maybe this implies me going over the other schemas checking the small stuff too. |
Co-authored-by: Daniel Garijo <dgarijov@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Daniel Garijo <dgarijov@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Daniel Garijo <dgarijov@gmail.com>
3 participants
This PR adds documentation for the assessment schema.
Ref:
Note: I set the version as 0.0.2 to be consistent with the other schemas. If you prefer to keep 0.0.1, I can revert that.