Conversation
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #841 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 86.57% 86.57%
=======================================
Files 47 47
Lines 5074 5074
Branches 5074 5074
=======================================
Hits 4393 4393
Misses 474 474
Partials 207 207 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
dalonsoa
approved these changes
Sep 24, 2025
Collaborator
dalonsoa
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think the schemas should be validated at some point to ensure they align with the input data. As of now, the schemas and the code are rather disconnected.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Fixes some small errors/omissions in the docs (some flagged in #820) that didn't warrant their own individual issues
Any ideas how we can automatically flag errors like this/keep this in sync with the code?