Skip to content

Conversation

@HenryHengZJ
Copy link
Contributor

image

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @HenryHengZJ, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request integrates the Gemini Code Interpreter feature, significantly expanding the capabilities of agents by allowing them to dynamically generate and execute Python code within a secure sandbox. This enhancement improves the agent's ability to perform complex tasks requiring computation and data manipulation, and provides a richer, more interactive experience by clearly presenting code execution steps and their outcomes in the chat interface.

Highlights

  • Gemini Code Interpreter Integration: Introduced a new codeExecution tool, allowing agents to write and execute Python code in a sandboxed environment, significantly expanding their capabilities.
  • Enhanced Response Handling: Implemented sophisticated parsing for Gemini model responses, enabling the display of executable code blocks, code execution results (output and errors), and text content in a structured format.
  • Improved Tool Deduplication: Enhanced the logic for tracking used tools (googleSearch, urlContext, codeExecution) to prevent redundant entries by comparing their input parameters, leading to more efficient tool usage.
  • UI Support for Code Execution: Added a dedicated icon for the codeExecution tool in the agent flow user interface, providing visual representation for the new functionality.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request adds support for the Gemini Code Interpreter, a valuable enhancement for the Agent node. The changes correctly introduce the new tool in the UI and backend, and handle the processing of code execution and results in both streaming and non-streaming modes. My review focuses on improving code quality. I've identified areas with significant code duplication that could be refactored into helper functions. I also noted a piece of logic for associating code with its output that could be made more robust. Finally, I've suggested improving type safety by replacing any types with specific interfaces for the new API response structures. These changes will make the code more maintainable and resilient.

@HenryHengZJ HenryHengZJ merged commit e6e0c2d into main Nov 28, 2025
5 checks passed
davehamptonusa pushed a commit to davehamptonusa/Flowise that referenced this pull request Dec 8, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants