Add a function to get the host corresponding to a given instance#28
Merged
dnachbaur merged 1 commit intoHBPVIS:masterfrom Nov 3, 2015
Merged
Add a function to get the host corresponding to a given instance#28dnachbaur merged 1 commit intoHBPVIS:masterfrom
dnachbaur merged 1 commit intoHBPVIS:masterfrom
Conversation
dnachbaur
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 3, 2015
Add a function to get the host corresponding to a given instance
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
@eile FYI
We want to get the hostname corresponding to an instance name in order to fix BlueBrain/Deflect#54
On my mac, this maps the computer name "Raphael’s MacBook Air (2)" to the hostname "Raphaels-MacBook-Air.local." which I can successfully connect to.
It would also be possible to get the key called "servus_host" directly, but it feels more like a strange and undocumented internal which we might want to change at some later point. Adding an explicit API function for that purpose makes sense IMO.