Plant data preparation details docs#1448
Plant data preparation details docs#1448jacobcook1995 merged 16 commits intofeature/docs-ui-updatefrom
Conversation
…oduced by or provided for other models
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## feature/docs-ui-update #1448 +/- ##
=======================================================
Coverage 94.09% 94.09%
=======================================================
Files 72 72
Lines 7581 7581
=======================================================
Hits 7133 7133
Misses 448 448 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
arne-exe
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hi Jacob, thanks for including these changes, this looks good.
I've added a few small extra changes.
docs/source/using_the_ve/model_details/plants/pft_configuration.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
docs/source/using_the_ve/model_details/plants/pft_configuration.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
docs/source/using_the_ve/model_details/plants/pft_configuration.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
No worries, it would have been nice to add this if there was an easy way to do it but this is not essential.
Alright.
Yeah makes sense, I am quite familiar with the plants model (or like to think I am) but it's hard for me to verify if descriptions match the calculations in the code due to the unfamiliar syntax in the code. It also doesn't help that many of the descriptions are either vague or open for interpretation in multiple ways.
I understand, deciding the priority of this given your timeline is up to you. I can see how this is less important from a coding perspective, but I think it's fair to say that from a calibration point of view this is a serious concern. I do hope that this is not something that gets buried and forgotten.
Thanks for doing that Jacob! |
Co-authored-by: arne-scheire <97458577+arne-exe@users.noreply.github.com>
…n.md Co-authored-by: arne-scheire <97458577+arne-exe@users.noreply.github.com>
…n.md Co-authored-by: arne-scheire <97458577+arne-exe@users.noreply.github.com>
…e the meaning clearer
Description
This PR adds a section for the specific data needs of the plant model to the user docs. This is based partly on what was already in the user docs and partly based on feedback from @arne-exe.
@arne-exe I made most of the smaller changes you suggested about the flow of the documents. Though annoyingly I couldn't get the link to the correct view of the variable table to work in text (it's quite fiddly/brittle even when it's on its own line). If there's anything else you feel should be altered feel free to suggest it
The point about the axis information is a really good one, but not one we can address at the moment. I made an issue to track this (see #1445)
A lot of the other comments were about making sure the variables had up to date descriptions/values. This isn't really something I can do as I'm not familiar enough with the plants model, when I asked David about this he said it isn't something he has time to address pre-MVP. So I think it's best kicked down the road till then (i.e. post Easter). What I did was go through the issues you've raised and addressed the ones where the change that needed to be made was clear to me. This only turned out to be two issues, but at least that's a start.
@davidorme, if you could also check that the changes look sane that would be great!
This is the relevant documentation to look at
Fixes #1377
Fixes #1379