Mention use of StyledStrings in Logging in NEWS#54301
Closed
tecosaur wants to merge 1 commit intoJuliaLang:backports-release-1.11from
Closed
Mention use of StyledStrings in Logging in NEWS#54301tecosaur wants to merge 1 commit intoJuliaLang:backports-release-1.11from
tecosaur wants to merge 1 commit intoJuliaLang:backports-release-1.11from
Conversation
Member
|
#52075 has to be fixed though and unless the rendering of StyledStrings is moved into Base I think the StyledStrings usage has to be reverted so we can move ConsoleLogger into Base? |
Member
Author
|
I thought the fix being explored was #53660? |
Member
|
Putting Logging back into the sysimage is not a fix. |
Member
Author
|
Well, I'm referring to #53660 (comment) in particular. |
Member
|
Got reverted on 1.11 to fix regressions in the logging colors when Logging was not loaded. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Just seems like something worth adding in the wake of #51802 and #51829.