Improve Neovim 0.12+ health checks and local dev workflow#27
Merged
Mathijs-Bakker merged 2 commits intomasterfrom Mar 30, 2026
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
This PR updates godotdev.nvim health reporting and documentation to better match modern Neovim setups, especially Neovim 0.12+ with built-in LSP and vim.pack.
It also fixes a few workflow issues uncovered while testing the plugin from a local development checkout.
Changes
nvim-lspconfigformatter = falseas an explicit opt-out forautoformat-on-savenvim-treesittermodule layouts:checkhealth godotdevoutput by removing duplicated status prefixesnvim-dap is installed. Run :checkhealth dap for adapter-specific diagnostics.nvim-lspconfigas a required dependencyvim.packinstallation exampleWhy
The plugin already uses Neovim’s core LSP APIs, so the old nvim-lspconfig health warning was misleading on valid 0.12+ setups.
While testing in a real vim.pack-based config, a stale installed plugin copy also made it clear that local development workflows and health messaging should be more explicit and less confusing.
Testing
nvim --headless -u NONE -c "luafile tests/run.lua" -c "qa!"