feat: Add New Analytics Client

[chakra-guy]

Explanation

This PR introduces the @metamask/sdk-analytics package, a standalone analytics client for tracking usage events with batching, error handling, and OpenAPI schema validation. It lays the foundation for decoupling analytics from the relay server, by separating the client and making use of the new server as well. Integration with SDK and wallet to follow in later PRs.

References

Checklist

• I've updated the test suite for new or updated code as appropriate
• I've updated documentation (JSDoc, Markdown, etc.) for new or updated code as appropriate
• I've highlighted breaking changes using the "BREAKING" category above as appropriate

[socket-security]

Review the following changes in direct dependencies. Learn more about Socket for GitHub.

Diff	Package	Supply Chain Security	Vulnerability	Quality	Maintenance	License
	npm/​typescript-eslint@​8.31.1
	npm/​vitest@​3.1.2
	npm/​eslint-plugin-promise@​7.2.1
	npm/​tsup@​8.4.0
	npm/​openapi-fetch@​0.13.5
	npm/​nock@​14.0.4
	npm/​eslint-plugin-import-x@​4.11.0
	npm/​eslint-import-resolver-typescript@​4.3.4

View full report

[socket-security]

All alerts resolved. Learn more about Socket for GitHub.

This PR previously contained dependency changes with security issues that have been resolved, removed, or ignored.

Ignoring alerts on:

• npm/[email protected]
• npm/[email protected]
• npm/[email protected]
• npm/[email protected]
• npm/[email protected]
• npm/[email protected]
• npm/[email protected]
• npm/@open-draft/[email protected]
• npm/@open-draft/[email protected]
• npm/@open-draft/[email protected]
• npm/[email protected]
• npm/[email protected]
• npm/[email protected]
• npm/[email protected]
• npm/[email protected]
• npm/[email protected]
• npm/[email protected]
• npm/[email protected]
• npm/[email protected]
• npm/[email protected]
• npm/[email protected]
• npm/[email protected]
• npm/[email protected]
• npm/[email protected]
• npm/@metamask/[email protected]
• npm/@metamask/[email protected]
• npm/@es-joy/[email protected]
• npm/[email protected]
• npm/[email protected]
• npm/[email protected]
• npm/[email protected]
• npm/[email protected]
• npm/[email protected]
• npm/[email protected]
• npm/[email protected]
• npm/[email protected]
• npm/[email protected]
• npm/[email protected]
• npm/[email protected]
• npm/[email protected]
• npm/[email protected]
• npm/[email protected]
• npm/@vitest/[email protected]
• npm/@vitest/[email protected]
• npm/@vitest/[email protected]
• npm/@vitest/[email protected]
• npm/@vitest/[email protected]
• npm/@vitest/[email protected]
• npm/@vitest/[email protected]
• npm/[email protected]
• npm/[email protected]
• npm/[email protected]
• npm/@mswjs/[email protected]
• npm/@esbuild/[email protected]
• npm/@esbuild/[email protected]
• npm/@esbuild/[email protected]
• npm/@esbuild/[email protected]
• npm/@esbuild/[email protected]
• npm/@esbuild/[email protected]
• npm/@esbuild/[email protected]
• npm/@esbuild/[email protected]
• npm/@esbuild/[email protected]
• npm/@esbuild/[email protected]
• npm/@esbuild/[email protected]
• npm/@esbuild/[email protected]
• npm/@esbuild/[email protected]
• npm/@esbuild/[email protected]
• npm/@esbuild/[email protected]
• npm/@esbuild/[email protected]
• npm/@esbuild/[email protected]
• npm/@esbuild/[email protected]
• npm/[email protected]
• npm/@esbuild/[email protected]
• npm/@esbuild/[email protected]
• npm/@esbuild/[email protected]
• npm/@esbuild/[email protected]
• npm/@esbuild/[email protected]
• npm/@esbuild/[email protected]
• npm/@esbuild/[email protected]
• npm/[email protected]
• npm/[email protected]
• npm/[email protected]
• npm/[email protected]

View full report

[ecp4224]

Overall LGTM with 1 question

[ecp4224]

Should this be configurable via SDK options?

[elribonazo]

hmm, good point. At the same time this is going to be bundled inside other SDKS and only one who would benefit from having this would be ourselves, but at the same time we should be able to isolate and test anything without exposing that

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 74.05%. Comparing base (7bf76cb) to head (a1fa14d).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1270   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   74.05%   74.05%           
=======================================
  Files         182      182           
  Lines        4352     4352           
  Branches     1066     1066           
=======================================
  Hits         3223     3223           
  Misses       1129     1129           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[elribonazo]

@SocketSecurity ignore-all

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[christopherferreira9]

LGTM