Skip to content

docs: Refresh NestJS case study with measured remediation structure #158

@sonukapoor

Description

@sonukapoor

Summary

Refresh the NestJS case study so it follows the stronger measured-remediation structure used in the updated Juice Shop study.

Why

The current NestJS write-up has useful evidence, but it needs a clearer publication-grade structure built around measured remediation results.

The updated version should:

  • include a strong top-line before/after table near the top
  • document the exact NestJS revision used
  • show the baseline scan and each remediation pass with real numbers
  • explain what dropped out after the first pass and what remained for the second pass
  • preserve honest remaining-risk discussion instead of forcing a zero-CVE framing
  • make the narrative more useful for developers, OWASP reviewers, and outreach

Scope

Update docs/case-studies/nestjs.md to:

  • rerun the case study against the reset local NestJS checkout
  • capture a fresh baseline and measured follow-up scan results
  • restructure the write-up to mirror the strongest parts of the Juice Shop study
  • keep the claims factual, reproducible, and tied to the documented revision

Notes

This should remain a practical remediation narrative, not marketing copy.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    documentationImprovements or additions to documentationhelp wantedExtra attention is needed

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions