Test rigorously for URLs while allowing relative URLs.#134
Test rigorously for URLs while allowing relative URLs.#134kpodemski merged 5 commits intoPrestaShop:devfrom
Conversation
9b8429b to
cdd36fd
Compare
Progi1984
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@PierreRambaud I approve. With this, the module is compatible with a bigger range of modules.
e2a73b2 to
38c94fa
Compare
|
@Progi1984 |
|
Yes, I was able to reproduce the issue with dev branch. But this PR, I think, is blocked by this issue. Thanks! |
|
Could you please reopen the PR ? It could then be tested by QA. |
|
Hello @jf-viguier @khouloudbelguith && @lmeyer1 Pull Request reopen |
|
Thanks @okom3pom, curiously, this PR is tagged in the next version here : 5.0.5 |
|
This PR has a |
This ping was the right thing to do 😄 |
|
Hello, I think we need to add the Blocked label since this PR cannot be tested because of this issue PrestaShop/PrestaShop#28292 Thanks! |
|
@khouloudbelguith This PR should be unblocked and PrestaShop/PrestaShop#28292 should be closed. It seems the latter has been fixed here: 0011b28 |
hibatallahAouadni
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hello @lmeyer1
Thanks for your PR 🚀
The issue of custom link url validation has been fixed with this PR 👏
But I found another issue, see the attached screen record below:
issue_25299.webm
When I tried to add a custom URL while my domain is composed (ex: prestashop/prestashop800/) the linklist module will use only the first part of the URL (ex:prestashop).
So, is this issue should be fixed in this PR or it's out of scope this PR?
Waiting for your feedback.
Thanks!
|
@hibatallahAouadni Without this PR, the custom URL part of this module is not usable in a multishop context. Now it is, with the exception when the participating shop do not all share the same Virtual URI (by default |
|
Thanks @lmeyer1 Sorry for the late response, it was still marked as "Waiting for author" :-( |
relativeProtocolas newer version have. I use therefore directly a regex.