fix: correct bn254 fp and fp2 chip comments#408
Merged
eigmax merged 1 commit intoProjectZKM:mainfrom Jan 16, 2026
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The comments for Bn254FpOpAssign and Bn254Fp2AddSubAssign were swapped, describing fp operations as fp2 add/sub and vice versa. This was confusing for anyone reading or searching by the documentation and could lead to misuse of these variants based on the wrong description. The change realigns the comments with the actual meaning of the enum variants without touching any functional code.