goose: rename to "goose-desktop" for Desktop in Extras, and add "goose" for CLI in Main

[ath0mas]

• Currently for goose, only extras/goose is available and installs the Desktop version of Goose, through Goose-win32-x64.zip.
• It should also be possible to install the CLI version, based on goose-x86_64-pc-windows-msvc.zip.
• Merging both would be an option, but both are quite heavy apps (600 MB for Desktop, 200 MB for CLI) so better just install the expected one only.

Inspired by a similar split done for opencode, I suggest to:

• add goose in Main for the CLI
• rename goose to goose-desktop here in Extras for the Desktop

See the opencode PRs and comments as a reference: ScoopInstaller/Main#7524, and #16996.

Any feedback on this please?
Can I start to create the Issues and PRs on both sides?
How to deal with the renaming and/or moving the current package to deprecated, technically, and to inform the end users?

[z-Fng]

Would it be better to stay consistent with the Homebrew package name? Adding goose-cli directly seems cleaner.
See: https://block.github.io/goose/docs/getting-started/installation

brew install block-goose
brew install block-goose-cli

cc @wang7x #16701 @Lutra-Fs @chawyehsu

How to deal with the renaming and/or moving the current package to deprecated, technically, and to inform the end users?

• opencode: Add version 1.1.15 Main#7524
• opencode-desktop: Add version 1.1.25 #16996
• opencode@1.1.25: Add notice about migration to Main bucket #17040
• ce96a0a

[chawyehsu]

Would it be better to stay consistent with the Homebrew package name? Adding goose-cli directly seems cleaner.
See: https://block.github.io/goose/docs/getting-started/installation

brew install block-goose
brew install block-goose-cli

↑ This

[z-Fng]

Would it be better to stay consistent with the Homebrew package name? Adding goose-cli directly seems cleaner.

Please feel free to open a pull request for this:

• [Request]: goose-cli Main#7788