Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #4214 +/- ##
=====================================
Coverage 99.7% 99.7%
=====================================
Files 349 349
Lines 38294 38294
=====================================
Hits 38174 38174
Misses 120 120
|
98f604d to
a61443e
Compare
| [ | ||
| (True, False, False, False, False, False), | ||
| (False, True, True, False, False, True), | ||
| (False, True, True, False, False, False), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We deleted this test case because sktime depreciated integer indexes
|
Might need to be addressed in either this PR or another one but I think we also need to cap the pandas version for conda for now. Here's a passing build with 1.5.3 while this build fails with 2.0.2. We can cap pandas in the EvalML repo or in the Conda recipe on this line. |
Its only passing in the other tests because |
|
@jeremyliweishih I agree that we should bump it up, but I think we should it in a follow up issue. It would keep the pandas 2.0 work separate from this PR. Should we open another PR for the pandas fixes only, merge that in, then rebase and get this in? |
b9e0744 to
595edfc
Compare
3cdf786 to
fe1acd2
Compare
| run: | ||
| - numpy >=1.21.0 | ||
| - pandas >=1.5.0 | ||
| - pandas >=1.5.0, <2.0.0 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can you file an issue to unpin if we don't already have one?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Do mention that we were not supporting it before as pip would not install > 2.0
Resolves: #4138