Skip to content

Pin pandas version#4315

Merged
eccabay merged 5 commits into
mainfrom
4313_pandas_version
Sep 19, 2023
Merged

Pin pandas version#4315
eccabay merged 5 commits into
mainfrom
4313_pandas_version

Conversation

@eccabay
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@eccabay eccabay commented Sep 19, 2023

Closes #4313

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented Sep 19, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch and project coverage have no change.

Comparison is base (cf6bc94) 99.7% compared to head (f1765e6) 99.7%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@          Coverage Diff          @@
##            main   #4315   +/-   ##
=====================================
  Coverage   99.7%   99.7%           
=====================================
  Files        357     357           
  Lines      39767   39767           
=====================================
  Hits       39647   39647           
  Misses       120     120           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@eccabay eccabay marked this pull request as ready for review September 19, 2023 20:00
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@christopherbunn christopherbunn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One question but otherwise LGTM

Comment on lines +18 to +19
- python_version: "3.9"
command: 'git-test-automl'
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we need to test on 3.9? If so, should we just bump up the Python versions to 3.9 across all tests?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Testing on 3.9 is how we can double check that the pinning worked, since pandas 2.1.0 isn't installed on 3.8. I don't think we should just immediately bump everything up, but I do agree that arbitrarily just running git-test-automl for 3.9 and not the others doesn't make much sense.

Thoughts on testing 3.9 alongside 3.8 for all PR tests? I don't think it'll add any time, since the tests all run in parallel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think adding one additional test for 3.9 is sufficient.

Comment on lines +18 to +19
- python_version: "3.9"
command: 'git-test-automl'
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think adding one additional test for 3.9 is sufficient.

@eccabay eccabay merged commit 2586974 into main Sep 19, 2023
@eccabay eccabay deleted the 4313_pandas_version branch September 19, 2023 20:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Pin pandas under 2.1.0

3 participants