Separate workers service accounts#52357
Merged
potiuk merged 6 commits intoapache:mainfrom Jul 18, 2025
Merged
Conversation
fde1734 to
9ca42ae
Compare
2b393a8 to
01aa0d5
Compare
Contributor
Author
|
Hi @dstandish @jedcunningham @hussein-awala, could you take a look at this PR? |
potiuk
approved these changes
Jul 18, 2025
karenbraganz
pushed a commit
to karenbraganz/airflow
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 18, 2025
* Seperate workers service accounts for kubernetes and celery workers * Add tests for new values * Add better description of some fields
This was referenced Dec 8, 2025
2 tasks
1 task
Miretpl
added a commit
to Miretpl/airflow
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 17, 2026
This reverts commit 23d955d.
1 task
jason810496
pushed a commit
to jason810496/airflow
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 22, 2026
* Revert "Separate workers service accounts (apache#52357)" This reverts commit 23d955d. * Revert "Add newsfragment for 52357 PR (apache#59214)" * Fix security tests
shreyas-dev
pushed a commit
to shreyas-dev/airflow
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 29, 2026
* Revert "Separate workers service accounts (apache#52357)" This reverts commit 23d955d. * Revert "Add newsfragment for 52357 PR (apache#59214)" * Fix security tests
98 tasks
jhgoebbert
pushed a commit
to jhgoebbert/airflow_Owen-CH-Leung
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 8, 2026
* Revert "Separate workers service accounts (apache#52357)" This reverts commit 23d955d. * Revert "Add newsfragment for 52357 PR (apache#59214)" * Fix security tests
choo121600
pushed a commit
to choo121600/airflow
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 22, 2026
* Revert "Separate workers service accounts (apache#52357)" This reverts commit 23d955d. * Revert "Add newsfragment for 52357 PR (apache#59214)" * Fix security tests
Subham-KRLX
pushed a commit
to Subham-KRLX/airflow
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 4, 2026
* Revert "Separate workers service accounts (apache#52357)" This reverts commit 23d955d. * Revert "Add newsfragment for 52357 PR (apache#59214)" * Fix security tests
Ankurdeewan
pushed a commit
to Ankurdeewan/airflow
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 15, 2026
* Revert "Separate workers service accounts (apache#52357)" This reverts commit 23d955d. * Revert "Add newsfragment for 52357 PR (apache#59214)" * Fix security tests
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
related: #28880
This change is part of #51460, which introduces full separation in configuration between Kubernetes and Celery executors. Example implementation of full separation is done by introducing the
workers.kubernetesandworkers.celerysections, which can be used to overwrite the commonworkerssection values. The separation of Service Accounts has a slightly different logic, as it does not allow for overwriting the common workers value by e.g. onlycelerysection, so I decided to extract that part to this PR.^ Add meaningful description above
Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a newsfragment file, named
{pr_number}.significant.rstor{issue_number}.significant.rst, in airflow-core/newsfragments.