chore: Enable GitHub discussions on arrow-go repository #353
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Member
|
Thanks @raulcd! I've been away last week and was about to do this today haha. But you beat me to it |
kou
pushed a commit
to apache/arrow-site
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 14, 2025
) The repositories that did not have GitHub discussions have been updated to also have GitHub discussions enabled. This PR updates the links and some minor details on the wording to remove the conditional. See: - apache/arrow-java#710 - apache/arrow-julia#546 - apache/arrow-go#353
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Rationale for this change
We have enabled GitHub discussions on all other repositories for Arrow.
What changes are included in this PR?
Changes to
.asf.yamlto enable GitHub discussions.Are these changes tested?
No relevant.
Are there any user-facing changes?
No