[Bug] one fewer share lock than before when inserting

[congxuebin]

Cloudberry Database version

PostgreSQL 14.4 (Cloudberry Database 1.0.0+d0add48 build commit:d0add48089f13bbaa31284ac62ab88eb79806671)

What happened

One fewer lock than before when inserting.

Expected result:

1: BEGIN;
BEGIN
1: INSERT INTO ao VALUES (200, 200);
INSERT 1
SELECT * FROM locktest;
coalesce             |      mode      |locktype
---------------------------------+----------------+--------
ao                               |RowExclusiveLock|relation
ao                               |RowExclusiveLock|relation
locktest                         |AccessShareLock |relation
pg_class                         |AccessShareLock |relation
pg_class                         |AccessShareLock |relation
pg_class_oid_index               |AccessShareLock |relation
pg_class_relname_nsp_index       |AccessShareLock |relation
pg_class_tblspc_relfilenode_index|AccessShareLock |relation
pg_locks                         |AccessShareLock |relation
(9 rows)

Actual result:

1: BEGIN;
BEGIN
1: INSERT INTO ao VALUES (200, 200);
INSERT 1
SELECT * FROM locktest;
coalesce             |      mode      |locktype
---------------------------------+----------------+--------
ao                               |RowExclusiveLock|relation
ao                               |RowExclusiveLock|relation
locktest                         |AccessShareLock |relation
pg_class                         |AccessShareLock |relation
pg_class_oid_index               |AccessShareLock |relation
pg_class_relname_nsp_index       |AccessShareLock |relation
pg_class_tblspc_relfilenode_index|AccessShareLock |relation
pg_locks                         |AccessShareLock |relation
(8 rows)

What you think should happen instead

No response

How to reproduce

tbd

Operating System

centos7

Anything else

No response

Are you willing to submit PR?

• Yes, I am willing to submit a PR!

Code of Conduct

• I agree to follow this project's Code of Conduct.

[avamingli]

Actual result: 9 rows,
Expected result: 8 rows?

fewer lock or more locks?

[avamingli]

Actual result: 9 rows,
Expected result: 8 rows?

I think you want to show Actual result: 8 rows, Expected result: 9 rows, right?

If so, it's called by #541

However, it's not a bug.
The pr uses syscache instead of open a table with a lock.
That's expected and better to hold less locks.
Such cases are not bugs, you need to adjust test cases.

[congxuebin]

As confirmed, new code change is an enhancement that no need to keep holding one of locks. Thus I adjusted test cases to accordingly.

UAOIsolationTestCase.test_locks ... 404.31 ms ... ok
UAOIsolationTestCase.test_locks_reindex ... 398.81 ms ... ok