Skip to content

Conversation

@tuhaihe
Copy link
Member

@tuhaihe tuhaihe commented Jul 4, 2023

Rename ideas.yml to ideas-feature-requests.yml to let GitHub Discussions category template work.


Change logs

rename ideas.yml to ideas-feature-requests.yml

Why are the changes needed?

Let GitHub Discussions Ideas/Feature-request template work.

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

No.

How was this patch tested?

No core code change. Don't need test.

Contributor's Checklist

Here are some reminders before you submit the pull request:

  • Document changes
  • Communicate in the GitHub Issues or Discussions (list them if needed)
  • Add tests for the change
  • Pass make installcheck
  • Pass make -C src/test installcheck-cbdb-parallel

Rename ideas.yml to ideas-feature-requests.yml to let GitHub Discussions 
category template work.
@tuhaihe tuhaihe requested review from TomShawn and yjhjstz July 4, 2023 03:53
Copy link
Contributor

@TomShawn TomShawn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Contributor

@TomShawn TomShawn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@tuhaihe tuhaihe merged commit d6605e4 into main Jul 4, 2023
@tuhaihe tuhaihe deleted the tuhaihe-patch-1 branch July 4, 2023 04:01
avamingli pushed a commit to avamingli/cloudberrydb that referenced this pull request Jan 21, 2025
## Problem
An error occurs in python lib when a plpython function is executed.
After our analysis, in the user's cluster, a plpython UDF 
was running with the unstable network, and got a timeout error:
`failed to acquire resources on one or more segments`.
Then a plpython UDF was run in the same session, and the UDF
failed with GC error.

Here is the core dump:
```
2023-11-24 10:15:18.945507 CST,,,p2705198,th2081832064,,,,0,,,seg-1,,,,,"LOG","00000","3rd party error log:
    #0 0x7f7c68b6d55b in frame_dealloc /home/cc/repo/cpython/Objects/frameobject.c:509:5
    #1 0x7f7c68b5109d in gen_send_ex /home/cc/repo/cpython/Objects/genobject.c:108:9
    #2 0x7f7c68af9ddd in PyIter_Next /home/cc/repo/cpython/Objects/abstract.c:3118:14
    #3 0x7f7c78caa5c0 in PLy_exec_function /home/cc/repo/gpdb6/src/pl/plpython/plpy_exec.c:134:11
    #4 0x7f7c78cb5ffb in plpython_call_handler /home/cc/repo/gpdb6/src/pl/plpython/plpy_main.c:387:13
    #5 0x562f5e008bb5 in ExecMakeTableFunctionResult /home/cc/repo/gpdb6/src/backend/executor/execQual.c:2395:13
    #6 0x562f5e0dddec in FunctionNext_guts /home/cc/repo/gpdb6/src/backend/executor/nodeFunctionscan.c:142:5
    #7 0x562f5e0da094 in FunctionNext /home/cc/repo/gpdb6/src/backend/executor/nodeFunctionscan.c:350:11
    apache#8 0x562f5e03d4b0 in ExecScanFetch /home/cc/repo/gpdb6/src/backend/executor/execScan.c:84:9
    apache#9 0x562f5e03cd8f in ExecScan /home/cc/repo/gpdb6/src/backend/executor/execScan.c:154:10
    #10 0x562f5e0da072 in ExecFunctionScan /home/cc/repo/gpdb6/src/backend/executor/nodeFunctionscan.c:380:9
    apache#11 0x562f5e001a1c in ExecProcNode /home/cc/repo/gpdb6/src/backend/executor/execProcnode.c:1071:13
    apache#12 0x562f5dfe6377 in ExecutePlan /home/cc/repo/gpdb6/src/backend/executor/execMain.c:3202:10
    apache#13 0x562f5dfe5bf4 in standard_ExecutorRun /home/cc/repo/gpdb6/src/backend/executor/execMain.c:1171:5
    apache#14 0x562f5dfe4877 in ExecutorRun /home/cc/repo/gpdb6/src/backend/executor/execMain.c:992:4
    apache#15 0x562f5e857e69 in PortalRunSelect /home/cc/repo/gpdb6/src/backend/tcop/pquery.c:1164:4
    apache#16 0x562f5e856d3f in PortalRun /home/cc/repo/gpdb6/src/backend/tcop/pquery.c:1005:18
    apache#17 0x562f5e84607a in exec_simple_query /home/cc/repo/gpdb6/src/backend/tcop/postgres.c:1848:10
```

## Reproduce
We can use a simple procedure to reproduce the above problem:
- set timeout GUC: `gpconfig -c gp_segment_connect_timeout -v 5` and `gpstop -ari`
- prepare function:
```
CREATE EXTENSION plpythonu;
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION test_func() RETURNS SETOF int AS
$$
plpy.execute("select pg_backend_pid()")

for i in range(0, 5):
    yield (i)

$$ LANGUAGE plpythonu;
```
- exit from the current psql session.
- stop the postmaster of segment: `gdb -p "the pid of segment postmaster"`
- enter a psql session.
- call `SELECT test_func();` and get error
```
gpadmin=# select test_func();
ERROR:  function "test_func" error fetching next item from iterator (plpy_elog.c:121)
DETAIL:  Exception: failed to acquire resources on one or more segments
CONTEXT:  Traceback (most recent call last):
PL/Python function "test_func"
```
- quit gdb and make postmaster runnable.
- call  `SELECT test_func();` again and get panic
```
gpadmin=# SELECT test_func();
server closed the connection unexpectedly
        This probably means the server terminated abnormally
        before or while processing the request.
The connection to the server was lost. Attempting reset: Failed.
!> 
```

## Analysis
- There is an SPI call in test_func(): `plpy.execute()`. 
- Then coordinator will start a subtransaction by PLy_spi_subtransaction_begin();
- Meanwhile, if the segment cannot receive the instruction from the coordinator,
  the subtransaction beginning procedure return fails.
- BUT! The Python processor does not know whether an error happened and
  does not clean its environment.
- Then the next plpython UDF in the same session will fail due to the wrong
  Python environment.

## Solution
- Use try-catch to catch the exception caused by PLy_spi_subtransaction_begin()
- set the python error indicator by PLy_spi_exception_set()


Co-authored-by: Chen Mulong <chenmulong@gmail.com>
avamingli pushed a commit to avamingli/cloudberrydb that referenced this pull request Jan 21, 2025
## Problem
An error occurs in python lib when a plpython function is executed.
After our analysis, in the user's cluster, a plpython UDF 
was running with the unstable network, and got a timeout error:
`failed to acquire resources on one or more segments`.
Then a plpython UDF was run in the same session, and the UDF
failed with GC error.

Here is the core dump:
```
2023-11-24 10:15:18.945507 CST,,,p2705198,th2081832064,,,,0,,,seg-1,,,,,"LOG","00000","3rd party error log:
    #0 0x7f7c68b6d55b in frame_dealloc /home/cc/repo/cpython/Objects/frameobject.c:509:5
    #1 0x7f7c68b5109d in gen_send_ex /home/cc/repo/cpython/Objects/genobject.c:108:9
    #2 0x7f7c68af9ddd in PyIter_Next /home/cc/repo/cpython/Objects/abstract.c:3118:14
    #3 0x7f7c78caa5c0 in PLy_exec_function /home/cc/repo/gpdb6/src/pl/plpython/plpy_exec.c:134:11
    #4 0x7f7c78cb5ffb in plpython_call_handler /home/cc/repo/gpdb6/src/pl/plpython/plpy_main.c:387:13
    #5 0x562f5e008bb5 in ExecMakeTableFunctionResult /home/cc/repo/gpdb6/src/backend/executor/execQual.c:2395:13
    #6 0x562f5e0dddec in FunctionNext_guts /home/cc/repo/gpdb6/src/backend/executor/nodeFunctionscan.c:142:5
    #7 0x562f5e0da094 in FunctionNext /home/cc/repo/gpdb6/src/backend/executor/nodeFunctionscan.c:350:11
    apache#8 0x562f5e03d4b0 in ExecScanFetch /home/cc/repo/gpdb6/src/backend/executor/execScan.c:84:9
    apache#9 0x562f5e03cd8f in ExecScan /home/cc/repo/gpdb6/src/backend/executor/execScan.c:154:10
    #10 0x562f5e0da072 in ExecFunctionScan /home/cc/repo/gpdb6/src/backend/executor/nodeFunctionscan.c:380:9
    apache#11 0x562f5e001a1c in ExecProcNode /home/cc/repo/gpdb6/src/backend/executor/execProcnode.c:1071:13
    apache#12 0x562f5dfe6377 in ExecutePlan /home/cc/repo/gpdb6/src/backend/executor/execMain.c:3202:10
    apache#13 0x562f5dfe5bf4 in standard_ExecutorRun /home/cc/repo/gpdb6/src/backend/executor/execMain.c:1171:5
    apache#14 0x562f5dfe4877 in ExecutorRun /home/cc/repo/gpdb6/src/backend/executor/execMain.c:992:4
    apache#15 0x562f5e857e69 in PortalRunSelect /home/cc/repo/gpdb6/src/backend/tcop/pquery.c:1164:4
    apache#16 0x562f5e856d3f in PortalRun /home/cc/repo/gpdb6/src/backend/tcop/pquery.c:1005:18
    apache#17 0x562f5e84607a in exec_simple_query /home/cc/repo/gpdb6/src/backend/tcop/postgres.c:1848:10
```

## Reproduce
We can use a simple procedure to reproduce the above problem:
- set timeout GUC: `gpconfig -c gp_segment_connect_timeout -v 5` and `gpstop -ari`
- prepare function:
```
CREATE EXTENSION plpythonu;
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION test_func() RETURNS SETOF int AS
$$
plpy.execute("select pg_backend_pid()")

for i in range(0, 5):
    yield (i)

$$ LANGUAGE plpythonu;
```
- exit from the current psql session.
- stop the postmaster of segment: `gdb -p "the pid of segment postmaster"`
- enter a psql session.
- call `SELECT test_func();` and get error
```
gpadmin=# select test_func();
ERROR:  function "test_func" error fetching next item from iterator (plpy_elog.c:121)
DETAIL:  Exception: failed to acquire resources on one or more segments
CONTEXT:  Traceback (most recent call last):
PL/Python function "test_func"
```
- quit gdb and make postmaster runnable.
- call  `SELECT test_func();` again and get panic
```
gpadmin=# SELECT test_func();
server closed the connection unexpectedly
        This probably means the server terminated abnormally
        before or while processing the request.
The connection to the server was lost. Attempting reset: Failed.
!> 
```

## Analysis
- There is an SPI call in test_func(): `plpy.execute()`. 
- Then coordinator will start a subtransaction by PLy_spi_subtransaction_begin();
- Meanwhile, if the segment cannot receive the instruction from the coordinator,
  the subtransaction beginning procedure return fails.
- BUT! The Python processor does not know whether an error happened and
  does not clean its environment.
- Then the next plpython UDF in the same session will fail due to the wrong
  Python environment.

## Solution
- Use try-catch to catch the exception caused by PLy_spi_subtransaction_begin()
- set the python error indicator by PLy_spi_exception_set()


Co-authored-by: Chen Mulong <chenmulong@gmail.com>
avamingli pushed a commit to avamingli/cloudberrydb that referenced this pull request Jan 22, 2025
## Problem
An error occurs in python lib when a plpython function is executed.
After our analysis, in the user's cluster, a plpython UDF 
was running with the unstable network, and got a timeout error:
`failed to acquire resources on one or more segments`.
Then a plpython UDF was run in the same session, and the UDF
failed with GC error.

Here is the core dump:
```
2023-11-24 10:15:18.945507 CST,,,p2705198,th2081832064,,,,0,,,seg-1,,,,,"LOG","00000","3rd party error log:
    #0 0x7f7c68b6d55b in frame_dealloc /home/cc/repo/cpython/Objects/frameobject.c:509:5
    #1 0x7f7c68b5109d in gen_send_ex /home/cc/repo/cpython/Objects/genobject.c:108:9
    #2 0x7f7c68af9ddd in PyIter_Next /home/cc/repo/cpython/Objects/abstract.c:3118:14
    #3 0x7f7c78caa5c0 in PLy_exec_function /home/cc/repo/gpdb6/src/pl/plpython/plpy_exec.c:134:11
    #4 0x7f7c78cb5ffb in plpython_call_handler /home/cc/repo/gpdb6/src/pl/plpython/plpy_main.c:387:13
    #5 0x562f5e008bb5 in ExecMakeTableFunctionResult /home/cc/repo/gpdb6/src/backend/executor/execQual.c:2395:13
    #6 0x562f5e0dddec in FunctionNext_guts /home/cc/repo/gpdb6/src/backend/executor/nodeFunctionscan.c:142:5
    #7 0x562f5e0da094 in FunctionNext /home/cc/repo/gpdb6/src/backend/executor/nodeFunctionscan.c:350:11
    apache#8 0x562f5e03d4b0 in ExecScanFetch /home/cc/repo/gpdb6/src/backend/executor/execScan.c:84:9
    apache#9 0x562f5e03cd8f in ExecScan /home/cc/repo/gpdb6/src/backend/executor/execScan.c:154:10
    #10 0x562f5e0da072 in ExecFunctionScan /home/cc/repo/gpdb6/src/backend/executor/nodeFunctionscan.c:380:9
    apache#11 0x562f5e001a1c in ExecProcNode /home/cc/repo/gpdb6/src/backend/executor/execProcnode.c:1071:13
    apache#12 0x562f5dfe6377 in ExecutePlan /home/cc/repo/gpdb6/src/backend/executor/execMain.c:3202:10
    apache#13 0x562f5dfe5bf4 in standard_ExecutorRun /home/cc/repo/gpdb6/src/backend/executor/execMain.c:1171:5
    apache#14 0x562f5dfe4877 in ExecutorRun /home/cc/repo/gpdb6/src/backend/executor/execMain.c:992:4
    apache#15 0x562f5e857e69 in PortalRunSelect /home/cc/repo/gpdb6/src/backend/tcop/pquery.c:1164:4
    apache#16 0x562f5e856d3f in PortalRun /home/cc/repo/gpdb6/src/backend/tcop/pquery.c:1005:18
    apache#17 0x562f5e84607a in exec_simple_query /home/cc/repo/gpdb6/src/backend/tcop/postgres.c:1848:10
```

## Reproduce
We can use a simple procedure to reproduce the above problem:
- set timeout GUC: `gpconfig -c gp_segment_connect_timeout -v 5` and `gpstop -ari`
- prepare function:
```
CREATE EXTENSION plpythonu;
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION test_func() RETURNS SETOF int AS
$$
plpy.execute("select pg_backend_pid()")

for i in range(0, 5):
    yield (i)

$$ LANGUAGE plpythonu;
```
- exit from the current psql session.
- stop the postmaster of segment: `gdb -p "the pid of segment postmaster"`
- enter a psql session.
- call `SELECT test_func();` and get error
```
gpadmin=# select test_func();
ERROR:  function "test_func" error fetching next item from iterator (plpy_elog.c:121)
DETAIL:  Exception: failed to acquire resources on one or more segments
CONTEXT:  Traceback (most recent call last):
PL/Python function "test_func"
```
- quit gdb and make postmaster runnable.
- call  `SELECT test_func();` again and get panic
```
gpadmin=# SELECT test_func();
server closed the connection unexpectedly
        This probably means the server terminated abnormally
        before or while processing the request.
The connection to the server was lost. Attempting reset: Failed.
!> 
```

## Analysis
- There is an SPI call in test_func(): `plpy.execute()`. 
- Then coordinator will start a subtransaction by PLy_spi_subtransaction_begin();
- Meanwhile, if the segment cannot receive the instruction from the coordinator,
  the subtransaction beginning procedure return fails.
- BUT! The Python processor does not know whether an error happened and
  does not clean its environment.
- Then the next plpython UDF in the same session will fail due to the wrong
  Python environment.

## Solution
- Use try-catch to catch the exception caused by PLy_spi_subtransaction_begin()
- set the python error indicator by PLy_spi_exception_set()


Co-authored-by: Chen Mulong <chenmulong@gmail.com>
avamingli pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 23, 2025
## Problem
An error occurs in python lib when a plpython function is executed.
After our analysis, in the user's cluster, a plpython UDF 
was running with the unstable network, and got a timeout error:
`failed to acquire resources on one or more segments`.
Then a plpython UDF was run in the same session, and the UDF
failed with GC error.

Here is the core dump:
```
2023-11-24 10:15:18.945507 CST,,,p2705198,th2081832064,,,,0,,,seg-1,,,,,"LOG","00000","3rd party error log:
    #0 0x7f7c68b6d55b in frame_dealloc /home/cc/repo/cpython/Objects/frameobject.c:509:5
    #1 0x7f7c68b5109d in gen_send_ex /home/cc/repo/cpython/Objects/genobject.c:108:9
    #2 0x7f7c68af9ddd in PyIter_Next /home/cc/repo/cpython/Objects/abstract.c:3118:14
    #3 0x7f7c78caa5c0 in PLy_exec_function /home/cc/repo/gpdb6/src/pl/plpython/plpy_exec.c:134:11
    #4 0x7f7c78cb5ffb in plpython_call_handler /home/cc/repo/gpdb6/src/pl/plpython/plpy_main.c:387:13
    #5 0x562f5e008bb5 in ExecMakeTableFunctionResult /home/cc/repo/gpdb6/src/backend/executor/execQual.c:2395:13
    #6 0x562f5e0dddec in FunctionNext_guts /home/cc/repo/gpdb6/src/backend/executor/nodeFunctionscan.c:142:5
    #7 0x562f5e0da094 in FunctionNext /home/cc/repo/gpdb6/src/backend/executor/nodeFunctionscan.c:350:11
    #8 0x562f5e03d4b0 in ExecScanFetch /home/cc/repo/gpdb6/src/backend/executor/execScan.c:84:9
    #9 0x562f5e03cd8f in ExecScan /home/cc/repo/gpdb6/src/backend/executor/execScan.c:154:10
    #10 0x562f5e0da072 in ExecFunctionScan /home/cc/repo/gpdb6/src/backend/executor/nodeFunctionscan.c:380:9
    #11 0x562f5e001a1c in ExecProcNode /home/cc/repo/gpdb6/src/backend/executor/execProcnode.c:1071:13
    #12 0x562f5dfe6377 in ExecutePlan /home/cc/repo/gpdb6/src/backend/executor/execMain.c:3202:10
    #13 0x562f5dfe5bf4 in standard_ExecutorRun /home/cc/repo/gpdb6/src/backend/executor/execMain.c:1171:5
    #14 0x562f5dfe4877 in ExecutorRun /home/cc/repo/gpdb6/src/backend/executor/execMain.c:992:4
    #15 0x562f5e857e69 in PortalRunSelect /home/cc/repo/gpdb6/src/backend/tcop/pquery.c:1164:4
    #16 0x562f5e856d3f in PortalRun /home/cc/repo/gpdb6/src/backend/tcop/pquery.c:1005:18
    #17 0x562f5e84607a in exec_simple_query /home/cc/repo/gpdb6/src/backend/tcop/postgres.c:1848:10
```

## Reproduce
We can use a simple procedure to reproduce the above problem:
- set timeout GUC: `gpconfig -c gp_segment_connect_timeout -v 5` and `gpstop -ari`
- prepare function:
```
CREATE EXTENSION plpythonu;
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION test_func() RETURNS SETOF int AS
$$
plpy.execute("select pg_backend_pid()")

for i in range(0, 5):
    yield (i)

$$ LANGUAGE plpythonu;
```
- exit from the current psql session.
- stop the postmaster of segment: `gdb -p "the pid of segment postmaster"`
- enter a psql session.
- call `SELECT test_func();` and get error
```
gpadmin=# select test_func();
ERROR:  function "test_func" error fetching next item from iterator (plpy_elog.c:121)
DETAIL:  Exception: failed to acquire resources on one or more segments
CONTEXT:  Traceback (most recent call last):
PL/Python function "test_func"
```
- quit gdb and make postmaster runnable.
- call  `SELECT test_func();` again and get panic
```
gpadmin=# SELECT test_func();
server closed the connection unexpectedly
        This probably means the server terminated abnormally
        before or while processing the request.
The connection to the server was lost. Attempting reset: Failed.
!> 
```

## Analysis
- There is an SPI call in test_func(): `plpy.execute()`. 
- Then coordinator will start a subtransaction by PLy_spi_subtransaction_begin();
- Meanwhile, if the segment cannot receive the instruction from the coordinator,
  the subtransaction beginning procedure return fails.
- BUT! The Python processor does not know whether an error happened and
  does not clean its environment.
- Then the next plpython UDF in the same session will fail due to the wrong
  Python environment.

## Solution
- Use try-catch to catch the exception caused by PLy_spi_subtransaction_begin()
- set the python error indicator by PLy_spi_exception_set()


Co-authored-by: Chen Mulong <chenmulong@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants