Skip to content

Conversation

@rickyma
Copy link
Contributor

@rickyma rickyma commented Mar 6, 2024

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Use a better computation logic for WriteAndReadMetricsTest without using reflection.

Why are the changes needed?

No need to use reflection, which will be quite confusing sometimes.

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

No.

How was this patch tested?

Existing UTs.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Mar 6, 2024

Test Results

2 312 files  ±0  2 312 suites  ±0   4h 36m 6s ⏱️ +30s
  823 tests ±0    822 ✅ ±0   1 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
9 697 runs  ±0  9 683 ✅ ±0  14 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 50af7b0. ± Comparison against base commit d8aedf3.

@jerqi jerqi requested a review from zuston March 7, 2024 02:36
Copy link
Member

@zuston zuston left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Thanks for your contribution! @rickyma

@zuston zuston merged commit d994b27 into apache:master Mar 7, 2024
@rickyma rickyma deleted the minor-write-read-metrics-test branch May 5, 2024 08:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants