Skip to content

Conversation

@valfirst
Copy link
Collaborator

@valfirst valfirst commented Jan 9, 2018

Change list

  • Upgrade to Checkstyle 8.7
  • Fix checkstyle violations found after version update

Types of changes

What types of changes are you proposing/introducing to Java client?
Put an x in the boxes that apply

  • No changes in production code.
  • Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)

* or {@link org.openqa.selenium.WebElement} or
* {@link io.appium.java_client.pagefactory.Widget} or some other user's
* extension/implementation.
* Creates field decorator based on serach {@code context} and timeout {@code duration}.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should be SearchContext

</module>
<module name="NeedBraces"/>
<module name="LeftCurly">
<property name="maxLineLength" value="100"/>
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Was it intentionally removed?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes, it was deprecated for a long time and finally it was removed in Checkstyle 8.2: checkstyle/checkstyle#3671

toolVersion = '7.0'
toolVersion = '8.7'
configFile = file("$projectDir/google-style.xml")
showViolations = true
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@TikhomirovSergey
Copy link
Contributor

@SrinivasanTarget I will check it today.

@TikhomirovSergey TikhomirovSergey merged commit 56e4c18 into appium:master Jan 11, 2018
@valfirst valfirst deleted the upgrade-checkstyle branch February 15, 2018 20:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants