tests: Use BasicTestingSetup to initialise fuzzing environment#19074
Closed
practicalswift wants to merge 3 commits intobitcoin:masterfrom
Closed
tests: Use BasicTestingSetup to initialise fuzzing environment#19074practicalswift wants to merge 3 commits intobitcoin:masterfrom
practicalswift wants to merge 3 commits intobitcoin:masterfrom
Conversation
Contributor
Author
|
|
Member
|
That commit seems unrelated. Mind splitting it up so that the libevent reviewers can review it? |
9efd3f9 to
7dfc605
Compare
Contributor
Author
|
@MarcoFalke Done! |
880200a to
5196ecb
Compare
Contributor
|
The following sections might be updated with supplementary metadata relevant to reviewers and maintainers. ConflictsNo conflicts as of last run. |
This was referenced Jun 9, 2020
5196ecb to
b39fa7a
Compare
maflcko
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 10, 2020
…event when handling PROXY requests 20d31bd tests: Avoid fuzzer-specific nullptr dereference in libevent when handling PROXY requests (practicalswift) Pull request description: Avoid constructing requests that will be interpreted by libevent as PROXY requests to avoid triggering a `nullptr` dereference. Split out from #19074 as suggested by MarcoFalke. The dereference (`req->evcon->http_server`) takes place in `evhttp_parse_request_line` and is a consequence of our hacky but necessary use of the internal function `evhttp_parse_firstline_` in the `http_request` fuzzing harness. The suggested workaround is not aesthetically pleasing, but it successfully avoids the troublesome code path. `" http:// HTTP/1.1\n"` was a crashing input prior to this workaround. Before this PR: ``` $ echo " http:// HTTP/1.1" > input $ src/test/fuzz/http_request input src/test/fuzz/http_request: Running 1 inputs 1 time(s) each. Running: input AddressSanitizer:DEADLYSIGNAL ================================================================= ==27905==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: SEGV on unknown address 0x000000000108 (pc 0x55a169b7e053 bp 0x7ffd452f1160 sp 0x7ffd452f10e0 T0) ==27905==The signal is caused by a READ memory access. ==27905==Hint: address points to the zero page. #0 0x55a169b7e053 in evhttp_parse_request_line depends/work/build/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/libevent/2.1.11-stable-36daee64dc1/http.c:1883:37 #1 0x55a169b7d9ae in evhttp_parse_firstline_ depends/work/build/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/libevent/2.1.11-stable-36daee64dc1/http.c:2041:7 #2 0x55a1687f624e in test_one_input(std::vector<unsigned char, std::allocator<unsigned char> > const&) src/test/fuzz/http_request.cpp:51:9 … $ echo $? 1 ``` After this PR: ``` $ echo " http:// HTTP/1.1" > input $ src/test/fuzz/http_request input src/test/fuzz/http_request: Running 1 inputs 1 time(s) each. Running: input Executed input in 0 ms *** *** NOTE: fuzzing was not performed, you have only *** executed the target code on a fixed set of inputs. *** $ echo $? 0 ``` See [`doc/fuzzing.md`](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/fuzzing.md) for information on how to fuzz Bitcoin Core. Don't forget to contribute any coverage increasing inputs you find to the [Bitcoin Core fuzzing corpus repo](https://github.com/bitcoin-core/qa-assets). Happy fuzzing :) Top commit has no ACKs. Tree-SHA512: 7a6b68e52cbcd6c117487e74e47760fe03566bec09b0bb606afb3b652edfd22186ab8244e8e27c38cef3fd0d4a6c237fe68b2fd22e0970c349e4ab370cf3e304
…ing context without debug logging (avoids writing to disk)
b39fa7a to
e2b8598
Compare
sidhujag
pushed a commit
to syscoin/syscoin
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 11, 2020
… in libevent when handling PROXY requests 20d31bd tests: Avoid fuzzer-specific nullptr dereference in libevent when handling PROXY requests (practicalswift) Pull request description: Avoid constructing requests that will be interpreted by libevent as PROXY requests to avoid triggering a `nullptr` dereference. Split out from bitcoin#19074 as suggested by MarcoFalke. The dereference (`req->evcon->http_server`) takes place in `evhttp_parse_request_line` and is a consequence of our hacky but necessary use of the internal function `evhttp_parse_firstline_` in the `http_request` fuzzing harness. The suggested workaround is not aesthetically pleasing, but it successfully avoids the troublesome code path. `" http:// HTTP/1.1\n"` was a crashing input prior to this workaround. Before this PR: ``` $ echo " http:// HTTP/1.1" > input $ src/test/fuzz/http_request input src/test/fuzz/http_request: Running 1 inputs 1 time(s) each. Running: input AddressSanitizer:DEADLYSIGNAL ================================================================= ==27905==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: SEGV on unknown address 0x000000000108 (pc 0x55a169b7e053 bp 0x7ffd452f1160 sp 0x7ffd452f10e0 T0) ==27905==The signal is caused by a READ memory access. ==27905==Hint: address points to the zero page. #0 0x55a169b7e053 in evhttp_parse_request_line depends/work/build/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/libevent/2.1.11-stable-36daee64dc1/http.c:1883:37 #1 0x55a169b7d9ae in evhttp_parse_firstline_ depends/work/build/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/libevent/2.1.11-stable-36daee64dc1/http.c:2041:7 #2 0x55a1687f624e in test_one_input(std::vector<unsigned char, std::allocator<unsigned char> > const&) src/test/fuzz/http_request.cpp:51:9 … $ echo $? 1 ``` After this PR: ``` $ echo " http:// HTTP/1.1" > input $ src/test/fuzz/http_request input src/test/fuzz/http_request: Running 1 inputs 1 time(s) each. Running: input Executed input in 0 ms *** *** NOTE: fuzzing was not performed, you have only *** executed the target code on a fixed set of inputs. *** $ echo $? 0 ``` See [`doc/fuzzing.md`](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/fuzzing.md) for information on how to fuzz Bitcoin Core. Don't forget to contribute any coverage increasing inputs you find to the [Bitcoin Core fuzzing corpus repo](https://github.com/bitcoin-core/qa-assets). Happy fuzzing :) Top commit has no ACKs. Tree-SHA512: 7a6b68e52cbcd6c117487e74e47760fe03566bec09b0bb606afb3b652edfd22186ab8244e8e27c38cef3fd0d4a6c237fe68b2fd22e0970c349e4ab370cf3e304
Contributor
Author
|
@MarcoFalke I think you requested something along the lines of this PR at one time: do we want to proceed with this or should I close? :) |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Use
BasicTestingSetupto initialise fuzzing environment (as suggested by MarcoFalke).Also: Remove unreachable fuzzing code. Various small coverage improvements.
See
doc/fuzzing.mdfor information on how to fuzz Bitcoin Core. Don't forget to contribute any coverage increasing inputs you find to the Bitcoin Core fuzzing corpus repo.Happy fuzzing :)