Skip to content

Conversation

@dschwoerer
Copy link
Contributor

This gives dependent codes more time to adopt.

It gives a warning now, with the intent to revert later to get the error again.

We can revert this commit later, to finally remove it.
Sorry that I did not think of this earlier, but it is not yet released, so might be still be useful ...

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍"

This gives dependend codes more time to adopt.
@dschwoerer dschwoerer force-pushed the reintroduce-implicit-copy branch from 6e7bdf3 to 2c01f10 Compare March 21, 2024 10:17
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍"

Copy link
Contributor

@bendudson bendudson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @dschwoerer ! This is a good idea that I didn't think of. I guess this is why we have a next branch :)

@bendudson bendudson merged commit 77193ef into next Mar 21, 2024
@bendudson bendudson deleted the reintroduce-implicit-copy branch March 21, 2024 14:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants