New debian validation pipeline (infra)#1369
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1369 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 45.12% 45.12%
=======================================
Files 366 366
Lines 39057 39058 +1
Branches 6607 6607
=======================================
+ Hits 17625 17626 +1
Misses 20758 20758
Partials 674 674
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Hook25
force-pushed
the
verify_packages_pipeline
branch
from
3c11405 to
623aba3
Compare
Hook25
force-pushed
the
verify_packages_pipeline
branch
from
0dcecf7 to
52e688e
Compare
p-gentili
left a comment
p-gentili
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It would be nice to filter out configurations from the matrix that are not involved.
Since it only takes 4 minutes to run instead of hours debugging problems with dependencies, we can address this later if it's not trivial.
Co-authored-by: Paolo Gentili <paolo.gentili@canonical.com>
|
I agree that this is subottimal as is, but it does give a nice barrier to trivial mistakes. I will search for a clean solution to only run what is necessary but the metabox one can't be easily adapted to this so I will do it in a follow up |
* New debian validation pipeline * Fix dependency problem to checkbox-support --------- Co-authored-by: Paolo Gentili <paolo.gentili@canonical.com>
2 participants
Description
This new workflow builds the debian packages when relevant files are changed.
Resolved issues
We have broken the debian packages twice in the last 2 days
Documentation
N/A
Tests
N/A