Add Secure Boot support manifest entry (new)#1956
Merged
Conversation
I checked the boot_mode_test.py script and, when called with `efi` parameter, it does not check that Secure Boot is active.
pieqq
changed the title
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1956 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 50.52% 50.52%
=======================================
Files 384 384
Lines 41111 41111
Branches 7531 7531
=======================================
Hits 20770 20770
Misses 19599 19599
Partials 742 742
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
mreed8855
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 30, 2025
* Add had_secure_boot manifest entry * Use secure boot manifest entry in jobs requiring secure boot Fix #1478 * Fix job purpose I checked the boot_mode_test.py script and, when called with `efi` parameter, it does not check that Secure Boot is active.
mreed8855
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 31, 2025
* Add had_secure_boot manifest entry * Use secure boot manifest entry in jobs requiring secure boot Fix #1478 * Fix job purpose I checked the boot_mode_test.py script and, when called with `efi` parameter, it does not check that Secure Boot is active.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
WARNING: This modifies com.canonical.certification::sru-server
Description
Add a manifest entry to let Checkbox know whether the DUT supports Secure Boot or not.
Raspberry Pis are known to fail the Secure Boot related tests because they don't have Secure Boot support, this PR should help skipping the tests on these devices.
Resolved issues
Fix #1478
Documentation
Tests
Tested locally using
iot-ubuntucore-24-automatedandserver-miscellaneoustest plans to check bothmiscellanea/secure_boot_mode_gadgetandmiscellanea/secure_boot_modejobs.Note that during testing, I found a problem with how the manifest script loads the providers (#1955).