-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.9k
try pypy 3.9 in CI #7956
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
try pypy 3.9 in CI #7956
Conversation
|
Codecov centrally ingests .xml .json and .txt type coverage report formats. If your language / test suite does not generate one of these format coverage reports, you may need to add a conversion step to your build process. |
Codecov ReportBase: 90.14% // Head: 90.14% // No change to project coverage 👍
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #7956 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 90.14% 90.14%
=======================================
Files 138 138
Lines 17071 17071
Branches 2307 2307
=======================================
Hits 15388 15388
Misses 1430 1430
Partials 253 253
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here. ☔ View full report at Codecov. |
|
python 3.11 was failing but pypy 3.9 was passing |
|
have to handle python 3.11 in a different PR |
auvipy
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
merging pypy 3.9 only
This is just draft to improve related issues