Adding possibility to include Authorization header when using externa…

[vmladenovic]

…l extension marketplace

Fixes #7595

[code-asher]

Nice I like this! I think there might be some types that also need to be updated, but CI should tell us more once it runs.

I wonder if we can be more descriptive than token. Maybe authorizationHeaderToken? Or...hmm should we make it a general headers property maybe?? Then users could add whatever headers they need.

[code-asher]

Could we revert all these path changes that rename code-server to coder-code-server-fork?

[vmladenovic]

Nice I like this! I think there might be some types that also need to be updated, but CI should tell us more once it runs.

I wonder if we can be more descriptive than token. Maybe authorizationHeaderToken? Or...hmm should we make it a general headers property maybe?? Then users could add whatever headers they need.

I guess we could be more descriptive and use authorizationHeaderToken. My idea was to keep it really simple so I wouldn't go with the general "header" property for now if it's OK with you?