Skip to content

Conversation

@shoom3301
Copy link
Contributor

@shoom3301 shoom3301 commented Dec 16, 2025

Description

Solution of white iframe background color from one of the integrators.
More details: https://gist.github.com/jdanyow/9916d77f09089f8c6f7993438f8c292a

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Added a Troubleshooting section addressing widget display issues where an iframe may show a white background; explains how a page-level color-scheme meta tag can affect the widget and advises removing or adjusting that meta tag to restore expected appearance.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@shoom3301 shoom3301 self-assigned this Dec 16, 2025
@shoom3301 shoom3301 requested a review from a team as a code owner December 16, 2025 07:17
@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Dec 16, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Review Updated (UTC)
docs Ready Ready Preview Dec 22, 2025 9:18am

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 16, 2025

Walkthrough

Added a Troubleshooting section to the widget tutorial documenting an iframe white background issue and advising removal of a conflicting <meta name="color-scheme"> tag when it causes the problem.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Documentation Update
docs/cow-protocol/tutorials/widget/widget.md
Added a "Troubleshooting" section describing a white background appearance for the widget iframe and guidance to remove or adjust a <meta name="color-scheme"> tag if it causes the issue.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Poem

🐰 I hopped into docs to say,
A tiny iframe lost its way.
Remove the meta, let colors play,
Now the widget’s bright and gay. ✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Description check ❓ Inconclusive The description provides context for the change but lacks the structured template with a detailed 'Changes' section listing the modifications made. Add a 'Changes' section listing the specific updates made (e.g., Troubleshooting section added, meta tag guidance included) to match the repository template structure.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title 'feat: add Troubleshooting for widget' clearly describes the main change—adding a Troubleshooting section to the widget documentation.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch feat/widget-troubleshouting

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8853522 and 082c1f0.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs/cow-protocol/tutorials/widget/widget.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.18.1)
docs/cow-protocol/tutorials/widget/widget.md

600-600: Spaces inside code span elements

(MD038, no-space-in-code)

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
docs/cow-protocol/tutorials/widget/widget.md (1)

596-600: Consider linking to the implementation details gist for better context.

The troubleshooting entry mentions a known issue and its solution clearly. However, the PR description references a detailed gist explaining the root cause and implementation context. Consider adding a link to help integrators understand the issue more deeply, especially if it relates to CSS cascade or browser behavior specifics that might inform their own solutions.

🔎 Proposed enhancement
 ### White background of the iframe
 
-1. If you use `<meta name="color-scheme">` in your HTML document, it might affect the widget iframe background color. Try to remove the meta tag in that case.
+1. If you use `<meta name="color-scheme">` in your HTML document, it might affect the widget iframe background color. Try to remove the meta tag in that case.
+
+   For implementation details, see [this gist](https://gist.github.com/jdanyow/9916d77f09089f8c6f7993438f8c292a).
📜 Review details

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 082c1f0 and a259b2d.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs/cow-protocol/tutorials/widget/widget.md
🔇 Additional comments (1)
docs/cow-protocol/tutorials/widget/widget.md (1)

596-600: Inline code formatting is now correct.

The markdown linting issue from the previous review has been resolved—the inline code is properly formatted without extra spaces inside the backticks.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants