Skip to content

[variant] A better name for GET #9003

@frederick-vs-ja

Description

@frederick-vs-ja

The exposition-only name GET looks too macro-like despite denoting function templates. Would it be better to rename GET to unchecked-get or something like?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions