Merged
Conversation
30235e0 to
633955e
Compare
Contributor
Author
|
@maximebuyse I dropped the Lean changes, thanks :) |
Contributor
Ah seems like we need to ignore this resugaring case in the lean backend to make CI happy. |
c7128f0 to
0aaffa7
Compare
95d115d to
e0fe07c
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR cherry-picks some commit from @maximebuyse (see PR #1629).
This PR:
ExprKind::TupleandTy::Tuplenodes from the AST, those were unused (everything is just function or type application)