Add Tickets App API specification #8
Conversation
Walkthrough새로운 Tickets 애플리케이션의 API 문서가 추가되었습니다. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant C as Client
participant API as Tickets API
participant DB as Database
C->>API: GET /tickets 요청
API->>DB: 티켓 목록 조회
DB-->>API: 티켓 목록 응답
API-->>C: 티켓 목록 반환
C->>API: POST /tickets 요청 (새 티켓 생성)
API->>DB: 티켓 생성 요청
DB-->>API: 생성된 티켓 반환
API-->>C: 생성된 티켓 응답
C->>API: POST /tickets/{ticketId}/comments 요청 (댓글 생성)
API->>DB: 댓글 생성 요청
DB-->>API: 생성된 댓글 반환
API-->>C: 생성된 댓글 응답
Poem
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hello @nakyeonko3, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
Summary of Changes
This pull request introduces the initial API specification for a Tickets application. It defines the endpoints for managing tickets and their comments, including creating, retrieving, updating, and deleting them. The specification is written in OpenAPI 3.0.1 format and includes example requests and responses for each endpoint.
Highlights
- API Specification: The pull request introduces an OpenAPI 3.0.1 specification for a Tickets application, outlining endpoints for ticket and comment management.
- Endpoints: The specification defines endpoints for creating, retrieving, updating, and deleting tickets and comments.
- Example Requests/Responses: The specification includes example requests and responses for each endpoint, aiding in understanding and implementation.
Changelog
- tickets/README.md
- Added a basic README file with the title 'Tickets application API specification'.
- tickets/openapi.yaml
- Created an OpenAPI 3.0.1 specification file defining the API for a Tickets application.
- Defined endpoints for /tickets (GET, POST), /tickets/{id} (GET, PATCH, DELETE), and /tickets/{ticketId}/comments (GET, POST, DELETE).
- Included request and response examples for each endpoint.
- Specified data models for tickets and comments, including fields like id, title, description, status, and content.
- Configured server URL to https://tickets-api.codedemo.co.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
A ticket's life,
From open to closed state,
API guides it.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
The pull request introduces an OpenAPI specification for a Tickets application. The specification covers basic CRUD operations for tickets and comments. Overall, the structure is well-defined, but there are several areas where descriptions can be improved and examples can be made more comprehensive.
Summary of Findings
- Inconsistent descriptions: Some descriptions are in Korean while others are in English. All descriptions should be in English for consistency and broader understanding.
- Missing descriptions: Several parameters and responses lack descriptions, which reduces the clarity of the API specification.
- Incomplete schema definitions: The schema definitions for request and response bodies are often empty (
properties: {}), which doesn't provide enough information about the data structure. - Lack of error handling details: The specification lacks details about potential error responses (other than the 404 for DELETE /tickets/:id), which is important for clients to handle errors gracefully.
Merge Readiness
The pull request introduces a foundational API specification, but it requires several improvements before it can be considered complete. The inconsistencies in descriptions, missing details, and lack of error handling information need to be addressed. I recommend that the pull request not be merged until these issues are resolved. I am unable to directly approve the pull request, and users should have others review and approve this code before merging.
| patch: | ||
| summary: PATCH /tickets/:id | ||
| deprecated: false | ||
| description: 티켓 수정 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The description is in Korean. Please provide an English description for internationalization and consistency.
description: Updates an existing ticket
| delete: | ||
| summary: DELETE /tickets/:id | ||
| deprecated: false | ||
| description: 티켓 삭제 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The description is in Korean. Please provide an English description for internationalization and consistency.
description: Deletes a ticket
| description: | | ||
| 댓글 삭제 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The description is in Korean. Please provide an English description for internationalization and consistency.
description: Deletes a comment
| comments: [] | ||
| - id: 01JQFRSC1ZD0BD7J7CFC4Y4KXP | ||
| title: 새로운 티켓 | ||
| description: 티켓을 하나 추가하려고 합니다. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The description is in Korean. Please provide an English description for internationalization and consistency.
description: A new ticket to be added.
| properties: | ||
| title: | ||
| type: string | ||
| description: 새로운 티켓 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The description is in Korean. Please provide an English description for internationalization and consistency.
description: Title of the new ticket
| type: object | ||
| properties: {} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The properties field is empty. Define the properties of the response object to provide more information about the data structure.
schema:
type: object
properties:
id:
type: string
description: Unique identifier of the ticket
title:
type: string
description: Title of the ticket
description:
type: string
description: Description of the ticket
status:
type: string
description: Status of the ticket
comments:
type: array
items:
type: string
| application/json: | ||
| schema: | ||
| type: object | ||
| properties: {} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The properties field is empty. Define the properties of the response object to provide more information about the data structure.
schema:
type: object
properties:
id:
type: string
description: Unique identifier of the created ticket
title:
type: string
description: Title of the created ticket
description:
type: string
description: Description of the created ticket
status:
type: string
description: Status of the created ticket
comments:
type: array
items:
type: string
| type: object | ||
| properties: {} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The properties field is empty. Define the properties of the response object to provide more information about the data structure.
schema:
type: object
properties:
id:
type: string
description: Unique identifier of the comment
ticket_id:
type: string
description: Identifier of the ticket the comment belongs to
content:
type: string
description: Content of the comment
| type: object | ||
| properties: {} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The properties field is empty. Define the properties of the response object to provide more information about the data structure.
schema:
type: object
properties:
tickets:
type: array
items:
type: object
properties:
id:
type: string
description: Unique identifier for the ticket
title:
type: string
description: Title of the ticket
description:
type: string
description: Detailed description of the ticket
status:
type: string
description: Status of the ticket (open, closed, etc.)
comments:
type: array
items:
type: object
properties:
id:
type: string
description: Unique identifier for the comment
ticket_id:
type: string
description: Identifier of the ticket the comment belongs to
content:
type: string
description: Content of the comment
| schema: | ||
| type: object |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The properties field is empty. Define the properties of the response object to provide more information about the data structure.
schema:
type: object
properties:
id:
type: string
description: Unique identifier of the comment
ticket_id:
type: string
description: Identifier of the ticket the comment belongs to
content:
type: string
description: Content of the comment
nakyeonko3
changed the title
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
tickets/openapi.yaml (1)
317-323: 💡 Verification agent❓ Verification inconclusive
컴포넌트 및 보안 설정 검토
현재 components 내의 schemas와 securitySchemes가 빈 객체로 남아 있으며, 글로벌 security 필드도 빈 배열로 정의되어 있습니다. Checkov의 경고에 따르면 보안 규칙이 설정되지 않은 상태이므로, 실제 인증 및 권한 부여가 필요하다면 관련 스키마와 보안 설정을 추가하거나, 보안이 적용되지 않는 경우 이에 대한 명시적인 문서화가 필요해 보입니다.
보안 설정 관련 재검토 필요
tickets/openapi.yaml 파일의 317-323 라인을 보면, components 내의 schemas와 securitySchemes가 모두 빈 객체로 남아 있으며, 전역 보안 설정인 security 역시 빈 배열로 정의되어 있습니다. Checkov의 경고 메시지가 시사하듯, 이 상태는 인증 및 권한 부여가 필요한 상황에서 보안 규칙이 미설정되었음을 의미합니다.
- 인증 및 권한 부여가 필요한 경우: 관련 스키마와 보안 규칙 설정을 추가해 주시기 바랍니다.
- 보안 적용이 불필요한 경우: 그 의도를 명시적으로 문서화해 주십시오.
🧹 Nitpick comments (6)
tickets/README.md (1)
1-2: 기본 API 문서 헤더 확인됨새로운 Tickets 애플리케이션의 API 문서용 README 파일이 추가되었습니다. 헤더에 API 사양의 제목이 명시되어 있으나, 후속 섹션에 주요 엔드포인트나 사용 예제, 그리고 상세한 설명(예: OpenAPI 명세 파일에 대한 참조)을 추가하면 문서가 더욱 완성도 있어질 것 같습니다.
tickets/openapi.yaml (5)
9-51: GET /tickets 엔드포인트 문서화티켓 목록 조회(GET /tickets) 엔드포인트에 대해 요약, 설명, 예시 응답 등이 포함되어 있어 기본적인 구조는 잘 잡혀 있습니다. 다만 응답 스키마에서 'properties'가 빈 객체로 되어 있는 점은 추후 재사용 가능한 스키마(components/schemas)를 정의하여 참조할 수 있도록 개선하면 좋겠습니다.
52-92: POST /tickets 엔드포인트 문서화티켓 생성(POST /tickets) 엔드포인트가 요청 본문, 필수 필드 및 응답 예시 측면에서 잘 정의되어 있습니다. 응답 스키마에 보다 구체적인 모델 정의를 추가하면 클라이언트에서 API를 활용하는 데 명확성을 제공할 수 있습니다.
93-123: GET /tickets/{id} 엔드포인트 문서화특정 티켓을 조회하는 GET 요청이 경로 파라미터 'id'와 함께 상세하게 기술되어 있습니다. 응답 예시 또한 제공되어 이해하기 용이합니다. 추후 응답 스키마에 대한 구체적인 모델을 정의하는 것도 고려해보시기 바랍니다.
124-166: PATCH /tickets/{id} 엔드포인트 문서화티켓 수정(PATCH /tickets/{id}) 엔드포인트에서는 'status' 필드를 업데이트하도록 정의되어 있습니다. 상태에 대한 가능한 값(ex. open, closed 등)을 enum 타입으로 명시하면 API 사용자가 보다 명확하게 이해할 수 있을 것 같습니다.
167-208: DELETE /tickets/{id} 엔드포인트 문서화티켓 삭제(DELETE /tickets/{id}) 엔드포인트가 성공(200) 및 실패(404) 응답을 모두 포함하여 잘 정의되어 있습니다. 에러 응답에 대한 표준 스키마를 components에 추가하는 것도 향후 확장을 위해 고려해보세요.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
tickets/README.md(1 hunks)tickets/openapi.yaml(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Checkov (3.2.334)
tickets/openapi.yaml
[HIGH] 1-324: Ensure that the global security field has rules defined
(CKV_OPENAPI_4)
[HIGH] 1-324: Ensure that security operations is not empty.
(CKV_OPENAPI_5)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
tickets/openapi.yaml (5)
1-5: API 정보 섹션 초기화OpenAPI 버전, API 제목, 설명 및 버전 정보가 명확하게 기술되어 있습니다. 향후 API의 용도와 기능에 대해 좀 더 구체적인 설명을 추가하면 사용자에게 도움이 될 수 있습니다.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Checkov (3.2.334)
[HIGH] 1-324: Ensure that the global security field has rules defined
(CKV_OPENAPI_4)
[HIGH] 1-324: Ensure that security operations is not empty.
(CKV_OPENAPI_5)
6-7: 태그 설정 확인'tickets api' 태그가 정의되어 있어 API의 분류가 용이합니다. 태그가 확장될 경우, 추가적인 분류 체계도 고려해볼 수 있습니다.
209-237: GET /tickets/{ticketId}/comments 엔드포인트 문서화특정 티켓의 댓글 목록을 조회하는 GET 요청이 경로 파라미터 'ticketId'와 함께 명확하게 기술되어 있습니다. 응답 예시가 제공되어 있어 사용자에게 도움이 됩니다.
238-278: POST /tickets/{ticketId}/comments 엔드포인트 문서화댓글 생성 엔드포인트가 요청 본문 내 'content' 필드를 필수로 설정하고, 예시까지 제공하여 명확하게 문서화되어 있습니다. 이후 기능이 확장될 경우 이에 따른 필드 추가도 고려할 수 있습니다.
279-316: DELETE /tickets/{ticketId}/comments/{id} 엔드포인트 문서화특정 댓글 삭제를 위한 DELETE 요청이 두 개의 경로 파라미터(ticketId, id)와 함께 잘 정의되어 있으며, 응답 예시도 제공됩니다. 문서의 구조는 명확하고 이해하기 쉽습니다.
|
감사합니다! 👍 |
2 participants
Summary by CodeRabbit