ci: add include-hidden-files to actions/upload-artifact

[njzjz]

Due to a breaking change introduced in actions/upload-artifact#602.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features

  • Enhanced file handling in the workflow by including hidden files during job execution, improving output granularity.

• Bug Fixes

  • Adjusted job configuration to ensure accurate test duration reporting by considering hidden files.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The change introduces a new parameter, include-hidden-files: true, to a job in the GitHub Actions workflow file. This modification allows the job to process hidden files during execution, enhancing the workflow's file handling capabilities.

Changes

Files	Change Summary
.github/workflows/test_python.yml	Changed include-hidden-files from false to true to include hidden files in job processing.

---

Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5111e9b and 68e33d7.

Files selected for processing (1)

• .github/workflows/test_python.yml (1 hunks)

Additional context used

actionlint

.github/workflows/test_python.yml

62-62: input "include-hidden-files" is not defined in action "actions/upload-artifact@v4". available inputs are "compression-level", "if-no-files-found", "name", "overwrite", "path", "retention-days"

(action)

Additional comments not posted (1)

.github/workflows/test_python.yml (1)

62-62: LGTM!

The include-hidden-files parameter was recently introduced in the actions/upload-artifact action to include hidden files when uploading artifacts. This change is necessary to maintain the functionality of including hidden files in light of the breaking change introduced in the action.

The static analysis hint flagging this as an error can be ignored as it is a false positive. The parameter is valid based on the latest version of the action.

Tools

actionlint

62-62: input "include-hidden-files" is not defined in action "actions/upload-artifact@v4". available inputs are "compression-level", "if-no-files-found", "name", "overwrite", "path", "retention-days"

(action)

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
  • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Early access features: disabled

We are currently testing the following features in early access:

• Anthropic claude-3-5-sonnet for code reviews: Anthropic claims that the new Claude model has stronger code understanding and code generation capabilities than their previous models. Note: Our default code review model was also updated late last week. Please compare the quality of the reviews between the two models by toggling the early access feature.

Note:

• You can enable or disable early access features from the CodeRabbit UI or by updating the CodeRabbit configuration file.
• Please join our Discord Community to provide feedback and report issues on the discussion post.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 83.01%. Comparing base (5111e9b) to head (68e33d7).
Report is 205 commits behind head on devel.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##            devel    #4095      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   83.02%   83.01%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         524      524              
  Lines       51638    51638              
  Branches     3030     3030              
==========================================
- Hits        42870    42868       -2     
  Misses       7822     7822              
- Partials      946      948       +2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.