fix(Table): update style for ScrollingDialogContent

[ArgoZhang]

Link issues

fixes #6576

Summary By Copilot

Regression?

• Yes
• No

Risk

• High
• Medium
• Low

Verification

• Manual (required)
• Automated

Packaging changes reviewed?

• Yes
• No
• N/A

☑️ Self Check before Merge

⚠️ Please check all items below before review. ⚠️

• Doc is updated/provided or not needed
• Demo is updated/provided or not needed
• Merge the latest code from the main branch

Summary by Sourcery

Refactor the EditorForm component to simplify CSS class handling and wrap form items in a dedicated container, and fix textarea overflow by adding a max-height rule for scrolling dialog content in the Table component

Bug Fixes:

• Add max-height constraint to textarea in scrolling dialogs to prevent overflow

Enhancements:

• Refactor EditorForm to use a static root class, apply AdditionalAttributes on the root element, and wrap field groups inside a .form-body container

[sourcery-ai]

Reviewer's Guide

This PR refactors the EditorForm component by removing the dynamic ClassString, introducing explicit class attributes, restructuring the markup for group and unset-group rendering inside a new form-body wrapper, and removes the now-unused ClassString property. It also tightens the Table component’s scrolling dialog content by adding a max-height constraint to the textarea container.

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Refactor EditorForm component structure and styling	Replaced dynamic ClassString with @attributes and explicit class "bb-editor" Wrapped field groups in a container Removed obsolete ClassString property from code-behind Reorganized conditional logic for ShowUnsetGroupItemsOnTop, GroupItems, and UnsetGroupItems rendering	Components/EditorForm/EditorForm.razor Components/EditorForm/EditorForm.razor.cs
Add max-height constraint to scrolling dialog content	Introduced max-height: calc(100vh - 133px) on textarea scroll container	Components/Table/Table.razor.scss

Assessment against linked issues

Issue	Objective	Addressed	Explanation
#6576	Fix the UI bug caused by the current ScrollingDialogContent styles in the Table component.	✅
#6576	Unify the appearance of the built-in editor dialog and the custom editor dialog styles for a more visually consistent look.	✅

Possibly linked issues

• bug(Table): 设置 ScrollingDialogContent 样式导致 UI 不正确 #6576: The PR updates the table style for scrolling dialog content, fixing obscured column selection and button padding.
• bug(Table): 设置 ScrollingDialogContent 样式导致 UI 不正确 #6576: PR updates CSS for textarea in table cells to fix ScrollingDialogContent UI by adding max-height.
• bug(Table): 设置 ScrollingDialogContent 样式导致 UI 不正确 #6576: PR adjusts max-height for table footers within scrollable dialogs, fixing the reported style misalignment.

---

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

• Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
• Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
• Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
  issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
  review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
• Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
  request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
  @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
• Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
  the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
  want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
  (re-)generate the summary at any time.
• Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
  request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
• Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
  pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
  addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
• Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
  request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
  want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
  @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

• Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
  summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
• Change the review language.
• Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
• Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

• Contact our support team for questions or feedback.
• Visit our documentation for detailed guides and information.
• Keep in touch with the Sourcery team by following us on X/Twitter, LinkedIn or GitHub.

[sourcery-ai]

Hey @ArgoZhang - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:

• Confirm that EditorForm's AdditionalAttributes and previous form-body class are still applied as intended after removing the dynamic ClassString builder.
• Split the unrelated EditorForm changes from the Table style update into separate PRs for clearer reviews.
• Abstract or document the magic '133px' value in the max-height calc to improve maintainability.

Prompt for AI Agents

Please address the comments from this code review:
## Overall Comments
- Confirm that EditorForm's AdditionalAttributes and previous form-body class are still applied as intended after removing the dynamic ClassString builder.
- Split the unrelated EditorForm changes from the Table style update into separate PRs for clearer reviews.
- Abstract or document the magic '133px' value in the max-height calc to improve maintainability.

---

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨

• X
• Mastodon
• LinkedIn
• Facebook

_{Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (299e143) to head (6ab905c).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main     #6577   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files          721       721           
  Lines        31559     31556    -3     
  Branches      4450      4450           
=========================================
- Hits         31559     31556    -3     

Flag	Coverage Δ
BB	100.00% <100.00%> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.