Skip to content

Conversation

@christian-kreuzberger-dtx
Copy link
Collaborator

@christian-kreuzberger-dtx christian-kreuzberger-dtx commented Aug 28, 2025

Fixes #122

edit: though please let me know, if we should rather throw an exception.

image image

Copy link
Collaborator

@MrManny MrManny left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I haven't interacted with the DAVIS API that much, but on a surface level this looks bueno.

@MrManny
Copy link
Collaborator

MrManny commented Aug 28, 2025

I also don't think we should throw an exception instead.

@christian-kreuzberger-dtx christian-kreuzberger-dtx force-pushed the patch/122/handle-davis-error-response branch from 9e3c899 to d58da80 Compare August 29, 2025 06:14
@christian-kreuzberger-dtx christian-kreuzberger-dtx merged commit 262d626 into main Aug 29, 2025
4 checks passed
@christian-kreuzberger-dtx christian-kreuzberger-dtx deleted the patch/122/handle-davis-error-response branch August 29, 2025 12:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Errors from generate_dql_from_nl should also error out the tool call

3 participants