Feat/first implementation #1
Conversation
Changelist by BitoThis pull request implements the following key changes.
|
![bito-code-review[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1061978?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review Agent Run #8e8543
Actionable Suggestions - 2
-
edgee/__init__.py - 2
- Reliability: Missing HTTP Timeout · Line 133-134
- Error Handling: Incomplete Exception Coverage · Line 136-136
Additional Suggestions - 3
-
example/test.py - 2
-
Unsafe dict access · Line 19-19In test 1, using ['content'] could raise KeyError if the API response has no content (e.g., when tool_calls are present instead). It looks like this should use .get('content') for consistency with test 3 and to avoid crashes on edge cases.
Code suggestion
@@ -19,1 +19,1 @@ - print(f"Content: {response1.choices[0].message['content']}") + print(f"Content: {response1.choices[0].message.get('content')}")
-
Unsafe dict access · Line 34-34Similar to test 1, using ['content'] here risks KeyError if content is absent. Switching to .get('content') matches test 3's safer approach.
-
-
tests/test_edgee.py - 1
-
Misleading test name · Line 111-112The test method name 'test_send_with_input_object' is misleading since it uses a dictionary input, not an InputObject instance, which could confuse maintainers about what is being tested.
Code suggestion
@@ -111,2 +111,2 @@ - def test_send_with_input_object(self, mock_urlopen): - """Should send request with InputObject (dict)""" + def test_send_with_input_dict(self, mock_urlopen): + """Should send request with input dict"""
-
Review Details
-
Files reviewed - 5 · Commit Range:
4658947..22c1d86- .github/CODEOWNERS
- edgee/__init__.py
- example/test.py
- pyproject.toml
- tests/test_edgee.py
-
Files skipped - 3
- .github/workflows/check.yml - Reason: Filter setting
- .github/workflows/release.yml - Reason: Filter setting
- README.md - Reason: Filter setting
-
Tools
- Whispers (Secret Scanner) - ✔︎ Successful
- Detect-secrets (Secret Scanner) - ✔︎ Successful
- MyPy (Static Code Analysis) - ✔︎ Successful
- Astral Ruff (Static Code Analysis) - ✔︎ Successful
Bito Usage Guide
Commands
Type the following command in the pull request comment and save the comment.
-
/review- Manually triggers a full AI review. -
/pause- Pauses automatic reviews on this pull request. -
/resume- Resumes automatic reviews. -
/resolve- Marks all Bito-posted review comments as resolved. -
/abort- Cancels all in-progress reviews.
Refer to the documentation for additional commands.
Configuration
This repository uses Default Agent You can customize the agent settings here or contact your Bito workspace admin at [email protected].
Documentation & Help
AI Code Review powered by
| try: | ||
| with urlopen(request) as response: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The urlopen call lacks a timeout, which could cause the request to hang indefinitely if the server doesn't respond. Adding a reasonable timeout improves reliability.
Code suggestion
Check the AI-generated fix before applying
| try: | |
| with urlopen(request) as response: | |
| try: | |
| with urlopen(request, timeout=30) as response: |
Code Review Run #8e8543
Should Bito avoid suggestions like this for future reviews? (Manage Rules)
- Yes, avoid them
| try: | ||
| with urlopen(request) as response: | ||
| data = json.loads(response.read().decode("utf-8")) | ||
| except HTTPError as e: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Currently, only HTTPError is caught, but network connection failures raise URLError. Catching both ensures all request failures are handled gracefully.
Code suggestion
Check the AI-generated fix before applying
- from urllib.error import HTTPError
+ from urllib.error import HTTPError, URLError
@@ -136,3 +136,7 @@
- except HTTPError as e:
- error_body = e.read().decode("utf-8")
- raise RuntimeError(f"API error {e.code}: {error_body}") from e
+ except (HTTPError, URLError) as e:
+ if isinstance(e, HTTPError):
+ error_body = e.read().decode("utf-8")
+ raise RuntimeError(f"API error {e.code}: {error_body}") from e
+ else:
+ raise RuntimeError(f"Network error: {e.reason}") from e
Code Review Run #8e8543
Should Bito avoid suggestions like this for future reviews? (Manage Rules)
- Yes, avoid them
.github/workflows/check.yml
Outdated
| - uses: actions/checkout@v4 | ||
| - uses: actions/setup-python@v5 | ||
| with: | ||
| python-version: "3.12" |
|
To add Ruff checks and formatting to the workflow, insert these steps after the Python setup in .github/workflows/check.yml. This assumes Ruff is installed via pip; adjust if using a different method. .github/workflows/check.yml |
Code Review Agent Run #f0b778Actionable Suggestions - 0Additional Suggestions - 4
Review Details
Bito Usage GuideCommands Type the following command in the pull request comment and save the comment.
Refer to the documentation for additional commands. Configuration This repository uses Documentation & Help AI Code Review powered by |
CLEMENTINATOR
force-pushed
the
feat/first-implementation
branch
from
796cf6b to
2e772a1
Compare
CLEMENTINATOR
force-pushed
the
feat/first-implementation
branch
from
2e772a1 to
66f5739
Compare
Code Review Agent Run #b0035aActionable Suggestions - 0Additional Suggestions - 3
Review Details
Bito Usage GuideCommands Type the following command in the pull request comment and save the comment.
Refer to the documentation for additional commands. Configuration This repository uses Documentation & Help AI Code Review powered by |
Code Review Agent Run #b39500Actionable Suggestions - 0Review Details
Bito Usage GuideCommands Type the following command in the pull request comment and save the comment.
Refer to the documentation for additional commands. Configuration This repository uses Documentation & Help AI Code Review powered by |
Checklist
Description of Changes
Describe your changes here
Related Issues
List related issues here
Summary by Bito