Conversation
This commit moves the aggregation and mapping code from joda time to java time. This includes field mappers, root object mappers, aggregations with date histograms, query builders and a lot of changes within tests.
…m property configured
Contributor
Author
|
@elasticmachine run elasticsearch-ci/2 |
jasontedor
added a commit
to jasontedor/elasticsearch
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 23, 2019
…ead-de-duplication * elastic/master: (24 commits) [TEST] Mute MlMappingsUpgradeIT testMappingsUpgrade Streamline skip_unavailable handling (elastic#37672) Only bootstrap and elect node in current voting configuration (elastic#37712) Ensure either success or failure path for SearchOperationListener is called (elastic#37467) Target only specific index in update settings test Add a note how to benchmark Elasticsearch Don't use Groovy's `withDefault` (elastic#37726) Adapt SyncedFlushService (elastic#37691) Mute FilterAggregatorTests#testRandom Switch mapping/aggregations over to java time (elastic#36363) [ML] Update ML results mappings on process start (elastic#37706) Modify removal_of_types.asciidoc (elastic#37648) Fix edge case in PutMappingRequestTests (elastic#37665) Use new bulk API endpoint in the docs (elastic#37698) Expose sequence number and primary terms in search responses (elastic#37639) Remove LicenseServiceClusterNotRecoveredTests (elastic#37528) Migrate SpecificMasterNodesIT to Zen2 (elastic#37532) Fix MetaStateFormat tests Use plain text instead of latexmath Fix a typo in a warning message in TestFixturesPlugin (elastic#37631) ...
Member
|
Hi @spinscale, there is a test in filebeat failing with ES snapshot and a bisect points to this change. The failure seen is like this: Find the ES trace here. It seems unable to parse The test validates this ingest pipeline with these log files. |
jsoriano
added a commit
to jsoriano/beats
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 25, 2019
These dates fail to parse after recent changes in Elasticsearch for date formatting, see elastic/elasticsearch#36363 Information is still stored in parsed ECS fields.
jsoriano
added a commit
to elastic/beats
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 25, 2019
These dates fail to parse after recent changes in Elasticsearch for date formatting, see elastic/elasticsearch#36363 Information is still stored in parsed ECS fields.
This was referenced Aug 15, 2023
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
18 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is the PR of the java-time feature branch, so review can start. The cut-over to java time is a requirement so that we can support nanoseconds properly. Most of the code is replacing the joda time classes with the java time ones - however this cannot be done gradually, thus this one big feature-branch behind this PR.
This mainly converts the field mapper classes plus aggregations and their tests, but also some code in x-pack that relied on joda time.
Note: This cannot be merged yet because we want to push a BWC layer in master/6.x first and then merge this one. I will keep this branch up-to-date until this happens.
Relates #27330