Cleanup Deadcode in Rest Tests#37418
Merged
original-brownbear merged 1 commit intoelastic:masterfrom Jan 14, 2019
original-brownbear:cleanup-deadcode-rest-tests
Merged
Cleanup Deadcode in Rest Tests#37418original-brownbear merged 1 commit intoelastic:masterfrom original-brownbear:cleanup-deadcode-rest-tests
original-brownbear merged 1 commit intoelastic:masterfrom
original-brownbear:cleanup-deadcode-rest-tests
Conversation
Contributor
original-brownbear
commented
Jan 14, 2019
- Removing either dead code outright or redundant overrides
* Either dead code outright or redundant overrides removed
Collaborator
|
Pinging @elastic/es-core-infra |
Contributor
Author
|
@atorok thanks! |
jasontedor
added a commit
to jasontedor/elasticsearch
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 15, 2019
* master: (28 commits) Introduce retention lease serialization (elastic#37447) Update Delete Watch to allow unknown fields (elastic#37435) Make finalize step of recovery source non-blocking (elastic#37388) Update the default for include_type_name to false. (elastic#37285) Security: remove SSL settings fallback (elastic#36846) Adding mapping for hostname field (elastic#37288) Relax assertSameDocIdsOnShards assertion Reduce recovery time with compress or secure transport (elastic#36981) Implement ccr file restore (elastic#37130) Fix Eclipse specific compilation issue (elastic#37419) Performance fix. Reduce deprecation calls for the same bulk request (elastic#37415) [ML] Use String rep of Version in map for serialisation (elastic#37416) Cleanup Deadcode in Rest Tests (elastic#37418) Mute IndexShardRetentionLeaseTests.testCommit elastic#37420 unmuted test Remove unused index store in directory service Improve CloseWhileRelocatingShardsIT (elastic#37348) Fix ClusterBlock serialization and Close Index API logic after backport to 6.x (elastic#37360) Update the scroll example in the docs (elastic#37394) Update analysis.asciidoc (elastic#37404) ...
Member
|
@original-brownbear seems this one never made it to 6.x? Can you please backport it and update the labels here accordingly? |
Contributor
Author
|
@danielmitterdorfer thanks for pinging and sorry for missing this one. The dead code removed here is still in use in |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.