Add new ExpectedWithdrawals dataclass#4812
Merged
jtraglia merged 2 commits intoethereum:masterfrom Jan 9, 2026
Merged
Conversation
potuz
reviewed
Jan 8, 2026
Contributor
potuz
left a comment
potuz
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM, don't know why the Electra changes.
| ) | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| #### Execution payload |
Member
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The only reason this function was modified was to handle the additional return values from get_expected_withdrawals. With this PR, it is no longer necessary to do this.
Co-authored-by: JihoonSong <jihoonsong@users.noreply.github.com>
Member
Author
|
Ah good eye @jihoonsong. Thanks! |
rolfyone
approved these changes
Jan 8, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The return type from
get_expected_withdrawalshas become quite complex. @potuz suggested we make a named type for this instead (here). This PR introduces a newExpectedWithdrawalstype (dataclass) for this.