Skip to content

feature: headscale support#739

Closed
realies wants to merge 1 commit intoexo-explore:mainfrom
realies:main
Closed

feature: headscale support#739
realies wants to merge 1 commit intoexo-explore:mainfrom
realies:main

Conversation

@realies
Copy link

@realies realies commented Feb 27, 2025

not sure how useful this is given network latency performance reduction, but i already implemented it, so here we are

@AlexCheema
Copy link
Contributor

not sure how useful this is given network latency performance reduction, but i already implemented it, so here we are

I agree about network latency, however this will be useful for exo v2 where we have distributed algo's that work better over slow connections with high latency.

Have you tested this with your own headscale server?

@realies
Copy link
Author

realies commented Mar 1, 2025

didn't think work can be distributed in ways that scales well without nanosecond level latency between all hidden layers, but i'm not very familiar with modern nnet architectures either;

yeah, seemed to work fine over headscale, tested with a mbp and 2xnvidia gpus, all in different networks;

at times when exo is started it produces strange output, sometimes complete gibberish, other times repeating words, but that manifested when testing with two nodes over local udp too

@realies
Copy link
Author

realies commented Mar 18, 2025

@AlexCheema, can we merge this?

@AlexCheema AlexCheema force-pushed the main branch 2 times, most recently from a39f85b to 56f783b Compare October 21, 2025 16:29
@Evanev7
Copy link
Member

Evanev7 commented Dec 18, 2025

Thanks so much for your contribution and for taking the time to open this PR.

Since this repository has been fully rewritten and the license has changed, I’m closing all existing open PRs to avoid confusion and to align with the new codebase.

I really appreciate your interest in the project, and you’re very welcome to open a new PR against the updated version if you’d like and we look forward to reviewing it!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants