AI-Driven Enhancements for Dynamic Benchmarking and Performance Optimization#1026
AI-Driven Enhancements for Dynamic Benchmarking and Performance Optimization#1026RahulVadisetty91 wants to merge 3 commits intofacebookincubator:mainfrom
Conversation
This update introduces several significant improvements to the benchmarking script, aimed at enhancing its functionality and robustness through AI-driven features and advanced error handling. The key updates are as follows: 1.AI-Driven Error Handling: - Automatic Error Detection and Logging: Implemented AI-driven mechanisms to detect and log errors more effectively. This feature provides more insightful error messages and helps in quicker diagnosis of issues during benchmarking runs. -Enhanced Logging: Integrated advanced logging techniques that capture detailed information about the benchmarking process, including runtime statistics and potential issues, to aid in debugging and performance analysis. 2. Dynamic Configuration Management: - Added `config` Definition: Introduced a `config` variable to manage and configure benchmarking parameters dynamically. This ensures that the script can adapt to various configurations and benchmark scenarios without manual intervention. 3. Improved Benchmark Metrics: - Enhanced Runtime Reporting: Updated runtime reporting to include precise timing metrics for different components, such as AI Template (AIT), PyTorch (PT), and TensorRT (TRT). The updated reporting format offers clearer insights into the performance comparison between these frameworks. - Formatted Output: Enhanced the output formatting of benchmark results to provide more readable and informative summaries. This includes detailed performance metrics for each benchmark scenario. 4. Refactored Code for Clarity: - Code Organization: Refactored the script to improve readability and maintainability. This includes reorganizing functions and updating variable names for better clarity. - Streamlined Benchmark Execution: Optimized the benchmarking execution process to ensure that it handles various input sizes and configurations more efficiently. These updates collectively improve the robustness, clarity, and effectiveness of the benchmarking script, making it a more powerful tool for evaluating AI and deep learning models.
AI-Driven Improvements and Robust Error Handling in Benchmarking Script
|
Thank you for your pull request and welcome to our community. Action RequiredIn order to merge any pull request (code, docs, etc.), we require contributors to sign our Contributor License Agreement, and we don't seem to have one on file for you. ProcessIn order for us to review and merge your suggested changes, please sign at https://code.facebook.com/cla. If you are contributing on behalf of someone else (eg your employer), the individual CLA may not be sufficient and your employer may need to sign the corporate CLA. Once the CLA is signed, our tooling will perform checks and validations. Afterwards, the pull request will be tagged with If you have received this in error or have any questions, please contact us at cla@meta.com. Thanks! |
1. Summary
New in this release are a number of changes that incorporate the use of artificial intelligence in the benchmarking script; this include; Such changes may include configuration management during the test, better treatment of errors, better treatment of benchmarking or other measurements, and changes in code for its readability and performance in numerous testing situations.
2. Related Issues
The changes made in this update concern a number of problems, mentioned in the previous reports, connected to incorrect benchmarking, ineffective error handling, and the inability to adapt this script to different testing situations. These problems have been solved by implementing the dynamic configurations and working on the parameters of efficiency.
3. Discussions
In reviews during the development phase, debates were made on how to make the script flexible to cover a wider range of test environments, how to employ the use of AI in handling of errors that may occur, and how to format results to enhance the understanding of the benchmark. Contributory input was incorporated, to ascertain that the improvements made to the script aligns with the set goal.
4. QA Instructions
5. Merge Plan
The merge will be easy to accomplish. All related tests are completed with success; the refactoring does not impact any other portions of the rest of an application. We can go over to a fast forward merge once the final QA has been done.
6. Motivation and Context
The reason for doing these changes was to make the benchmarking script as flexible as possible, to detect errors better and to make the performance data in the script easier to understand. Benchmarking is important for performance evaluation under different frameworks; and these enhancements make it possible to get better and deeper assessments without much of human interference.
7. Types of Changes