Skip to content

add back hanabi1224 and AlexeyKrasnoperov to org and forest#163

Merged
BigLep merged 2 commits intofilecoin-project:masterfrom
LesnyRumcajs:master
Sep 4, 2025
Merged

add back hanabi1224 and AlexeyKrasnoperov to org and forest#163
BigLep merged 2 commits intofilecoin-project:masterfrom
LesnyRumcajs:master

Conversation

@LesnyRumcajs
Copy link
Contributor

Summary

Not sure why they were removed in cb18005 after I added them in #142. Adding them back; they're active Forest team members.

Why do you need this?

What else do we need to know?

DRI: myself

Reviewer's Checklist

  • It is clear where the request is coming from (if unsure, ask)
  • All the automated checks passed
  • The YAML changes reflect the summary of the request
  • The Terraform plan posted as a comment reflects the summary of the request

@LesnyRumcajs LesnyRumcajs requested a review from a team as a code owner September 4, 2025 15:15
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Sep 4, 2025

The following access changes will be introduced as a result of applying the plan:

Access Changes
User alexeykrasnoperov:
  - will join the organization as a [object Object] (remind them to accept the email invitation)
  - will gain push permission to builtin-actors
  - will gain push permission to f3-activation-contract
  - will gain push permission to fips
  - will gain push permission to fvm-test-vectors
  - will gain maintain permission to ref-fvm
User hanabi1224:
  - will join the organization as a [object Object] (remind them to accept the email invitation)
  - will gain push permission to builtin-actors
  - will gain push permission to f3-activation-contract
  - will gain push permission to fips
  - will gain push permission to fvm-test-vectors
  - will gain maintain permission to ref-fvm

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Sep 4, 2025

Before merge, verify that all the following plans are correct. They will be applied as-is after the merge.

Terraform plans

filecoin-project

Terraform used the selected providers to generate the following execution
plan. Resource actions are indicated with the following symbols:
  + create

Terraform will perform the following actions:

  # github_membership.this["alexeykrasnoperov"] will be created
  + resource "github_membership" "this" {
      + etag     = (known after apply)
      + id       = (known after apply)
      + role     = "member"
      + username = "AlexeyKrasnoperov"
    }

  # github_membership.this["hanabi1224"] will be created
  + resource "github_membership" "this" {
      + etag     = (known after apply)
      + id       = (known after apply)
      + role     = "member"
      + username = "hanabi1224"
    }

  # github_team_membership.this["forest:alexeykrasnoperov"] will be created
  + resource "github_team_membership" "this" {
      + etag     = (known after apply)
      + id       = (known after apply)
      + role     = "member"
      + team_id  = "4043513"
      + username = "AlexeyKrasnoperov"
    }

  # github_team_membership.this["forest:hanabi1224"] will be created
  + resource "github_team_membership" "this" {
      + etag     = (known after apply)
      + id       = (known after apply)
      + role     = "member"
      + team_id  = "4043513"
      + username = "hanabi1224"
    }

Plan: 4 to add, 0 to change, 0 to destroy.

@BigLep BigLep merged commit 1ac479f into filecoin-project:master Sep 4, 2025
6 checks passed
@BigLep
Copy link
Member

BigLep commented Sep 4, 2025

I don't know why they were removed in cb18005

That is a sync job that synchronizes this repo with what is actually the state of truth in github. This seems odd, but one potential explanation is they were removed in the github UI and the sync job just picked it up. (We'd have to check the GitHub audit log to understand if that happened and who did it. I'll go down that path if it happens again.)

Maybe @galargh has other ideas?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants