chore: corrected typos in routes comments

[JamesShaver]

Corrected typos in the comments

Fixes #0000

Changes proposed in this pull request:

Reviewers should focus on:

Screenshot

QA

Necessity

• Has the problem that is being solved here been clearly explained?
• If applicable, have various options for solving this problem been considered?
• For core PRs, does this need to be in core, or could it be in an extension?
• Are we willing to maintain this for years / potentially forever?

Confirmed

• Frontend changes: tested on a local Flarum installation.
• Backend changes: tests are green (run composer test).
• Core developer confirmed locally this works as intended.
• Tests have been added, or are not appropriate here.

Required changes:

• Related documentation PR: (Remove if irrelevant)
• Related core extension PRs: (Remove if irrelevant)

[askvortsov1]

Do we need all these comments? Feels like the code is fairly self explanatory

[JamesShaver]

Do we need all these comments? Feels like the code is fairly self explanatory

The code comments show up in IDEs, so I would say yes each method needs to be commented accurately.

[davwheat]

If they were function definitions, sure. I don't oppose to any of these, though.

[SychO9]

Thanks! I do agree with Sasha though, the code is readable enough not to need these comments.