Skip to content

Conversation

@hxrshxz
Copy link
Contributor

@hxrshxz hxrshxz commented Jan 25, 2026

Ⅰ. Describe what this PR does

Refactor pkg/ddc/thin/health_check_test.go from standard Go testing to Ginkgo/Gomega framework.

Ⅱ. Does this pull request fix one issue?

part of #5407

Ⅲ. List the added test cases if any

No new test cases added - this is a refactoring of existing tests to Ginkgo/Gomega format while maintaining the same coverage.

Ⅳ. Describe how to verify it

Run: go test ./pkg/ddc/thin/... -run TestThin -v

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @hxrshxz, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request focuses on improving the maintainability and readability of the health_check_test.go file by migrating its test suite to the Ginkgo and Gomega frameworks. This change modernizes the testing approach, making it easier to understand test intent and future modifications, without altering the underlying logic or coverage of the health check functionalities.

Highlights

  • Testing Framework Migration: The pkg/ddc/thin/health_check_test.go file has been refactored from using standard Go testing (testing package) to the Ginkgo/Gomega testing framework.
  • Improved Test Readability and Structure: Existing test cases for CheckRuntimeHealthy and checkFuseHealthy have been converted into descriptive Describe, Context, and It blocks, enhancing the clarity and organization of the tests.
  • Assertion Library Update: Assertions within the tests now utilize Gomega matchers (e.g., Expect(...).To(Equal(...))) for more expressive and robust test validations.
  • No Functional Changes: This pull request is purely a refactoring effort; no new test cases were added, and the existing test coverage and functionality remain unchanged.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@hxrshxz hxrshxz marked this pull request as draft January 25, 2026 12:05
@fluid-e2e-bot
Copy link

fluid-e2e-bot bot commented Jan 25, 2026

Hi @hxrshxz. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a fluid-cloudnative member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request successfully refactors health_check_test.go to use the Ginkgo/Gomega testing framework, which significantly improves the structure and readability of the tests. The extraction of magic strings into constants is also a welcome improvement for maintainability. I have provided a few suggestions to further enhance the test code by reducing duplication and strengthening an assertion.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 25, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 59.22%. Comparing base (6b4ab6b) to head (729f490).
⚠️ Report is 74 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #5498      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   56.76%   59.22%   +2.46%     
==========================================
  Files         443      444       +1     
  Lines       30735    30431     -304     
==========================================
+ Hits        17447    18024     +577     
+ Misses      11734    10912     -822     
+ Partials     1554     1495      -59     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@hxrshxz hxrshxz force-pushed the refactor/ginkgo-thin-health-check-test branch from 018bea4 to aa153fa Compare January 25, 2026 13:51
@hxrshxz hxrshxz marked this pull request as ready for review January 29, 2026 03:24
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings January 29, 2026 03:24
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Warning

You have reached your daily quota limit. Please wait up to 24 hours and I will start processing your requests again!

Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR successfully migrates the pkg/ddc/thin/health_check_test.go test file from the standard Go testing framework (using testify) to Ginkgo/Gomega. This is part of a broader effort to standardize Fluid's unit testing framework and improve testing coverage from 57% to at least 70%.

Changes:

  • Replaced standard Go test functions with Ginkgo's BDD-style Describe, Context, and It blocks
  • Replaced testify assertions with Gomega matchers for more expressive assertions
  • Introduced test constants to improve maintainability and reduce magic strings
  • Improved test organization with BeforeEach blocks for setup and clearer test descriptions

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

…ach pattern

Eliminated code duplication in CheckRuntimeHealthy and checkFuseHealthy tests
by extracting common test setup into BeforeEach blocks and using JustBeforeEach
for client initialization. This follows the standard pattern used across the
codebase (juicefs/sync_runtime_test, alluxio/master_internal_test) and improves
maintainability by adhering to DRY principle.

Addresses Copilot review feedback to reduce duplication and make tests more
maintainable using established codebase patterns.

Signed-off-by: Harsh <[email protected]>
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Copy link
Member

@TrafalgarZZZ TrafalgarZZZ left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@fluid-e2e-bot
Copy link

fluid-e2e-bot bot commented Feb 6, 2026

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: TrafalgarZZZ

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@TrafalgarZZZ TrafalgarZZZ merged commit 3b7b528 into fluid-cloudnative:master Feb 6, 2026
18 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants